Search for: "Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2023, 11:44 am
Publ’ns, Inc., 135 USPQ 374, 375 (TTAB 1962). [2] Ex parte Meredith Publ’g Co., 109 USPQ 426, 426 (Comm’r Pats. 1956). [3] Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 686 F.3d 1376 (Fed. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:44 am
Publ’ns, Inc., 135 USPQ 374, 375 (TTAB 1962). [2] Ex parte Meredith Publ’g Co., 109 USPQ 426, 426 (Comm’r Pats. 1956). [3] Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 686 F.3d 1376 (Fed. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 3:42 am
"Whether a non-syndicated column that is, for example, “printed, downloadable, or recorded on electronic media,” TMEP Section 1202.07(a), is a good in trade should be analyzed using the same standard we use to assess goods in trade issues in other contexts.The Board therefore adopted a new test, based on Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 686 F.3d 1376, 103 USPQ2d 1672, 1676 (Fed. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:28 am
Case citation: 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am
Case citation: 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 10:00 pm
In the case of 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
Can’t 1-800 Contacts Enforce Its Trademark Rights? [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 9:15 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad… [read post]
1 May 2018, 10:24 am
” Cites to: 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:38 am
(See generally 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
The Lens.com Litigation Was a Big Loss for 1-800 Contacts. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
(In addition to the trademark battle, Lens.com had a parallel antitrust lawsuit against 1-800 Contacts going back years). [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:54 am
See, e.g., 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 7:33 am
Feb. 5, 2015); 1–800–Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 8:30 am
GoTo.com: the search engine defendant generated $345 in revenue (not profit, just revenue) from the litigated terms. 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm
See 1–800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:38 am
Lens.com, Inc., 722 F.3d 1229 (10th Cir. 2013) and Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
It’s been years since the doctrine actually helped a plaintiff win a case; and to the extent other courts follow the 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:02 am
The decision is consistent with, and cites, the 2012 Federal Circuit decision in the long-running saga of Lens.com v. 1-800 Contacts. [read post]
