Search for: "Levi Strauss & Co. Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
The subject matter of the case Levi Strauss v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
A swift perusal of the Curia agenda for the next few weeks suggests that the brain cells of Europe's finest will [or at least should, notes Merpel] be stretched to the limit by, among other cases: * Case C-12/12 Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co., a reference from the Bundesgerichtshof, Germany, gets a hearing next week, on Thursday 29 November. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm
Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 12:40 pm
The court logically cites Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:36 am
MOZIE section 2(d) opposition but nixes fraud claim (TTABlog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Levi Strauss – Levi Strauss’s trademark and domain name claims may block unauthorized resales: Levi Strauss v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:35 am
The 9th Circuit's recent decision in Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
In Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:13 am
Activision (No Doubt sues over use of likeness in Band Hero) Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/6afzxzp Westlaw: http://tinyurl.com/6yrkbj8 Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Previously relying on the requirement that a mark be “identical or nearly identical” to the plaintiff’s famous mark for dilution to exist, the 9th Circuit in Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
Instead, in Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:13 pm
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded a district court opinion which found Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. did not dilute Levi Strauss’s registered mark, the “Arcuate” design. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) 9th Circuit changes dilution standard: Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:19 pm
The case cite is Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
" Levi Strauss & Co.,2009 WL 1082175, at *5. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
Surrey Services for Seniors, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
’s product liability litigation, and Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, which represents Levi Strauss & Co. in all non-intellectual property issues. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:34 pm
Companies that participated in the road testing exercise include: 3M, Abengoa, Acer Inc, Airbus S.A.S, AkzoNobel, Alcoa, Amcor, Ampacet, Anvil Knitwear, Inc., Autodesk, Inc., Baoshan Iron & Steel Co. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of COLLEGIATE COMMUNITY FINANCIAL for Credit Union Services (TTABlog) TTAB reverses 2(d) refusal of LEG BALANCE for athletic apparel over FOOT BALANCE for leather footwear (TTABlog) TTAB reverses refusal to register Cartier Watch design, finding 2(f) evidence sufficient (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps G & F Licensing – Screwed but not a Federal problem: G & F Licensing Corp. v Field & Stream Licenses… [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
Levi Strauss & Co., 471 F. [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:37 pm
Houlihan licensed the trade mark to Grape Links Inc that traded as Barefoot Cellars.Grape Links Inc was sold to Gallo by an agreement dated 10 November 2004. [read post]
