Search for: "Levitt v. Levitt" Results 1 - 20 of 275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2023, 8:35 am by Howard Gutman
No recalls issued The California case, Raul Siqueiros, et al. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 6:48 am by Ned Foley
Justin amplified the point behind his vivid metaphor: “There’s absolutely no question that the VRA remains one of the crown jewels of the civil rights… Continue reading The post Justin Levitt remains “in the fetal position” after Allen v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 5:57 am
Lund (University of Southern California), on Tuesday, January 11, 2022 Tags: Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioners have not met their "burden of establishing unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt" (O'Conner v Levitt, 51 A.D.2d 1090). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioners have not met their "burden of establishing unconstitutionality beyond a reasonable doubt" (O'Conner v Levitt, 51 A.D.2d 1090). [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am by Emily Dai
Matthew Levitt wrote about the Syrian government’s facilitation of the Islamic State’s survival in an effort to discredit the broader Syrian opposition. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am by Arturo Jara
” Loving Plot: This film follows the true story of Richard and Mildred Loving, the couple behind the landmark Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525 and other decisions, the Appellate Division  opined although "no individual had a vested right to be appointed to a vacant position — not even those whose scores placed them in the top three examinees", in this instance once individuals were appointed, they may have become entitled to damages or other relief based on Employer's alleged contractual breach, i.e., failure to make such appointments within the time frame… [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525 and other decisions, the Appellate Division  opined although "no individual had a vested right to be appointed to a vacant position — not even those whose scores placed them in the top three examinees", in this instance once individuals were appointed, they may have become entitled to damages or other relief based on Employer's alleged contractual breach, i.e., failure to make such appointments within the time frame… [read post]