Search for: "Lewis And Clark Marine, Inc. " Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2023, 11:51 am by Ben Allums and David L. Reisman
The question, though, is whether more changes will follow when the next marine casualty occurs. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
The Petitioner (PACE Local 8-0369) sought to represent a unit of all operations and maintenance technicians at the Employer's Valdez Marine Terminal (VMT) facility, relying on the Board's longstanding presumption that a single-facility unit is appropriate for collective bargaining. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Clark issued his decision Aug. 18, 2008. *** Cintas Corp. (4-CA-34160, et al.; 353 NLRB No. 81) Cincinnati, OH Jan. 30, 2009. [read post]
13 May 2009, 6:31 am
Inc- FTC Hearing on The Evolving IP Marketplace• Mallun Yen, Cisco Systems, Inc. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 12:39 pm by Susan Schneider
Reuben Clark Law School; Law Clerk, Law Offices of Michael J. [read post]
Arctic marine shipping: overview of the international legal framework, gaps, and options. 18 J. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm by admin
In it, he writes that the Lewis and Clark National Forest’s final travel plan in 2007 included provisions that had not been circulated in the draft Environmental Impact Statement, thus precluding public comment on those provisions. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:33 pm by Steven M. Taber
Previously, the Court ruled on March 10, that the 2007 Travel Management Plan issued by the Lewis and Clark National Forest in Montana violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Montana Wilderness Study Act (MWSA). [read post]