Search for: "Li v. Holder et al"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am
Dan Kahan et al.: SCt said no reasonable jury could find other than that the police officers in this high speed chase acted reasonably, but Kahan found significant variation in evaluations of reasonableness based on salient demographics. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
The Association For Molecular Pathology et al v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 9:39 pm
" But unlike Lemley et al., who argue that § 101 independently limits claim scope, Feldman says that "this limitation could be accomplished through the disclosure requirements of section 112. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:56 pm
Airgas, Inc., et al., C.A. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm
ADVANTAGE BUILDERS OF AMERICA, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee. 2nd District.Mortgage foreclosure -- Intervention -- Trial court properly denied motion to intervene filed by parties who sought to intervene more than twenty days after mortgagee had filed foreclosure complaint and filed notice of lis pendens -- Section 48.23(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2008), which allows the holders of unrecorded property interests only twenty days from the recording date of a lis… [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:15 pm
” Herbert Hovenkamp et al., IP & Antitrust § 35.2b (2010). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Quanta Storage America, Inc. et al. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
The statistics are damn lies. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
Blazed SKLO Podebrady S.I.O. et al v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
As the Supreme Court has framed the general issue of determining damages, at least for competitors, a court must ask, "[H]ad the Infringer not infringed, what would [the] Patent Holder[] have made? [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 8:14 am
Circuit in its FTC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
