Search for: "Li v. Strickland" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm by Richard Hunt
This sort of thing intrigues me, so I checked another case filed the same day, Brast v Columbian Cuisine, Case No. 4:23-cv-1339 (SD Tex). [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm by Phil Dixon
Where a right to appeal exists as to one ground of an order and not others, the appealing party is generally limited on appeal to arguing only the issue for which an appeal of right lies. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
He concluded that the burden for seeking attorney eyes only (AEO) lies with the party seeking it, and had not been met in this instance. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Writing for a majority of the Court, Justice O’Connor in Strickland v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:21 am by Amy Howe
But Lee’s conviction should still stand, the government argued, because the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
Further, the court found that the Florida Supreme Court unreasonably applied Strickland in holding that the deficiency was not prejudicial. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
One mea culpa for our last installment: Turns out we were Telling Lies when we said that False Claims Act (FCA) case AT&T, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by Rick
Let’s dispense with Missouri v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:33 am by SHG
” That's certainly true, but provides absolutely no guidance for the court in fashioning a rule or remedy, and therein lies the big issue in Lafler v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:59 am by Albert Wan
Chaidez, this time deciding the issue of whether the Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Winchester, MA; Jianwei Li, President) Arloli, Inc. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:18 pm
The standards, set in 1984 in a case called Strickland v. [read post]