Search for: "Liability and Insurers for each Defendant" Results 161 - 180 of 3,362
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2010, 6:24 am by Jim Singer
Of these factors, the types of claims being asserted against the policyholder are of particular importance because even if patent claims (or counterclaims) are not covered, the insurer may be required to cover the patent claims if any other claim triggers the insurer’s duty to defend. . . . [read post]
Reading the excess policies’ insuring agreements against the policies’ “other insurance” clause, the court concluded that the policy language does not say Scapa must exhaust all other policies issued at any other time before New Hampshire’s duties to defend and indemnify are triggered. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:45 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Andrew S. Koelz
  Excess: “Other insurance” clauses may provide that an insurer can limit its liability for defense costs and covered loss to only the amount exceeding what is covered by other applicable insurance policies. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:11 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
The Insurance Information Institute reports no U.S. insurance company offers stand-along gun liability insurance. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 5:35 am
" [17] The high cost of liability insurance may cause concern for business owners. [18] Each individual's business will have a unique cost that is calculated based on premiums. [19] "General liability premiums are typically based on sales, payroll, area or, in the case of an office, by class. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 2:55 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
(In our case, as in most cases involving employers and employees, either the employer’s liability insurance carrier or the employer itself, if self-insured (as is our corporate defendant), covers judgments, including those related to PFS fees and costs, entered against the employee. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 1:36 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 The broadcaster claimed that each potential recipient had consented to receiving the faxes, and the defendant trusted the broadcaster’s word. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:18 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The "Texas Changes--Conditions Requiring Notice" endorsement modified the insurance provided under the commercial general liability coverage part and provided:With regard to Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability, unless we are prejudiced by the Insured's or your failure to comply with the requirement, any provision of this Coverage Part requiring you or any insured to give notice of occurrence, claim, or suit, . . . will not bar liability… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The court began with “the principles that the duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify, and that it is triggered by the potential of liability, not an adjudication that the claims are covered. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 2:20 pm
  Although, as suggested above, the distinction may not ultimately subject the board to personal liability, it could impact the future cost of D&O liability insurance. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:49 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  While this may mean there is more insurance coverage, and the victim can therefore receive a full and appropriate financial recovery, it can also mean that the insurance companies will blame each other’s customers and try to deny liability. [read post]
5 May 2015, 11:37 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
 Some settle for $30,000 in case where the liability is clear or even if the defendant was drunk out of his mind. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 11:30 am by William A. Ruskin
In addition to a well drafted contract, defendants are often able to escape tort liability by invoking the economic loss rule. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 3:17 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently denied several commercial general liability insurers’ motions to dismiss, holding that the insurers may be required to defend the makers of Bluetooth Headsets against suits alleging negligent design and unfair marketing even though the suits do not allege that the plaintiffs suffered any physical injuries. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 11:46 am by Michael S. Levine
The ruling opens the door under each of the policyholder’s successive liability policies from 2000 to 2008, allowing the policyholder to recover millions of dollars in defense costs. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 11:46 am by Michael S. Levine
The ruling opens the door under each of the policyholder’s successive liability policies from 2000 to 2008, allowing the policyholder to recover millions of dollars in defense costs. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 7:01 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Interveners and defendant each presented separate motions for judgment in their favor, respectively, non obstante veredicto. [read post]