Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 21 - 40
of 20,948
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2018, 1:35 pm
Ultimately, the court concluded that the defendant corporation was not liable to the deceased’s estate because the corporation took no “affirmative conduct” that caused the man’s fall. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:25 am
Non liable agents will argue that someone else pays it for them; so as long as it gets paid what's the difference? [read post]
13 May 2010, 6:56 am
Not to mention the court, in its order, found Lime Group's CEO personally liable as well:VII. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 7:36 am
The court’s opinion largely focused on the question of whether the defendant’s negligence was the proximate cause of the plaintiffs’ injuries. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 4:12 pm
In determining the existence of a duty, the court considers many factors, including the foreseeability of harm to the plaintiff, the degree of certainty that the plaintiff suffered the injury, the closeness of the connection between the defendant’s conduct and the injury suffered, the moral blame attached to the defendant’s conduct, the policy of preventing future harm, the extent of the burden to the defendant, and others. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:25 am
” The trial judge held that she could only find the defendant liable for the portion of the plaintiff’s loss occasion by the defendant’s fault, not for any loss that was contributed to by the repair shop’s fault. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 10:00 am
The District Court determined that one defendant, Ajit Bains, was personally liable, but that another individual defendant, Satinder Sharma, was not liable. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
In this post-trial opinion, in addition to breaches of contract, the Court of Chancery held that the defendants were liable for fraud because they failed to disclose internal billing practices that created the appearance of higher company revenue. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 7:37 am
It is worth noting that the defendant(s) opted to settle the case described in this essay after the Pa. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 4:28 pm
Instead, plaintiff argued that the individual defendant was vicariously liable for the company’s infringement. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
District Court for the District of Nevada held that the CAFA’s amount-in-controversy requirement cannot be aggregated when each plaintiff’s claims are wholly unrelated to the other and when the defendants are not jointly liable. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 11:00 am
It’s not that retailers or sellers can never be held liable for false advertising, but they can’t be held liable based solely on display and sale of the Rhino products in their stores. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:11 pm
Then, the victim or his or her attorney will need to prove the claim being made against the defendant(s). [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 11:27 am
Culinary Institute of America, the court ultimately determined that since the fatal accident occurred while the defendant’s employee was on his way home from work and was not engaged in any work-related activity, the defendant was not vicariously liable for the employee’s actions. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 11:27 am
Culinary Institute of America, the court ultimately determined that since the fatal accident occurred while the defendant’s employee was on his way home from work and was not engaged in any work-related activity, the defendant was not vicariously liable for the employee’s actions. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:42 am
To support a showing of constructive knowledge, a plaintiff can demonstrate that a defendant remained “willfully blind” to the infringing actor’s unlawful conduct, which takes place when a defendant suspects wrongdoing but fails to investigate it. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:20 pm
After a 16-day bench trial, the district court found that Commerce Planet had violated § 5(a) and held Gugliuzza, the company’s former president, personally liable for the company’s unlawful conduct. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:52 am
The maintenance worker did not work for the defendant grocery store, but for a company that the grocery store had contracted with to perform all the store’s cleaning. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 1:31 pm
The appellate court reviewed the jury’s finding that the employer was liable on a theory of respondeat superior, ultimately holding that there was no evidence that the defendant employee had been acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 3:25 pm
In the Appellate Court's opinion, under the common law definition, the employers were the Wins Corporations, not the Defendants and therefore, the Defendants were not personally liable for the unpaid wages and penalties. [read post]
