Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 121 - 140 of 20,996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2015, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Administrator of Victim’s estate and family members sued the Defendants, alleging, in relevant part, that Defendants were liable for the Victim’s death because Defendants were negligent in the hiring, retention, and supervision” of Officer. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
Following the decision, LPG appealed the decision arguing that there was a genuine issue of fact as to whether Jackson hit Dixon and that Jackson should also be held liable for Dixon’s injuries. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Defendant had submitted his deposition testimony and the affidavit of an expert opining that Defendant's house contained no building code violations that contributed to the firefighter's injuries. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Defendant had submitted his deposition testimony and the affidavit of an expert opining that Defendant's house contained no building code violations that contributed to the firefighter's injuries. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 9:33 am by Brent Wieand
The jury found that the defendant, Marine Transport, was 70% liable for Pantano’s injuries and awarded the plaintiff $1.23 million in damages. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 3:36 pm by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
ARE Accessories, LLC When is a product’s use “foreseeable” to the manufacturer? [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:51 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Having failed to do so, [defendant] is liable for injuries sustained by [plaintiff] when the fixture and ceiling fell on her. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:00 am by James M. McClammer
  The court also reversed the trial court’s finding of liability against the defendants under a theory of unjust enrichment. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
  One such theory was that receipt of royalties from the sale of infringing music rendered a party liable for the underlying infringement. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 6:35 am by Patrick J. Murphy, Esq.
Here, for example, the lower court determined that the defendant could be held criminally liable for his accomplice’s death because the taxi driver was resisting a crime committed by the defendant himself. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 6:14 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
“Ledesma provides causation is established for purposes of California tort law if the defendants conduct is a ‘substantial factor’ in bringing about the plaintiff’s injury,” Cargain said. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:01 am by McNicholas & McNicholas LLP
When you are driving home from a friend’s house and a drunk driver suddenly slams into your vehicle, you may be thinking that it is obvious that the driver is liable for your accident. [read post]
31 May 2018, 10:17 am by Cross & Smith
  If an employer did not have sufficient control over the employee (i.e., the employee was in such a position where they could select their job duties without employer supervision), then they cannot be held vicariously liable for the employee’s negligent acts. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:47 am by SearcyLaw
Homeowner (or the Homeowner’s Insurance Company) If you slipped and fell at someone else’s home, you may have a claim against the homeowner. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:47 am by SearcyLaw
Homeowner (or the Homeowner’s Insurance Company) If you slipped and fell at someone else’s home, you may have a claim against the homeowner. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 6:47 am by SearcyLaw
Homeowner (or the Homeowner’s Insurance Company) If you slipped and fell at someone else’s home, you may have a claim against the homeowner. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 1:31 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
 The appellate court reviewed the jury’s finding that the employer was liable on a theory of respondeat superior, ultimately holding that there was no evidence that the defendant employee had been acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 10:04 am
However, courts have also found that a defendant may only be held liable for injuries that were a “reasonably foreseeable” result of their negligence. [read post]