Search for: "Lilly France" Results 41 - 60 of 135
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2017, 1:16 pm
UK Supreme Court moves towards a UK Doctrine of Equivalents in Lilly pemetrexed battle? [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 9:53 am
UK Supreme Court moves towards a UK Doctrine of Equivalents in Lilly pemetrexed battle? [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Actavis avait saisi les juridictions britanniques en déclaration de non contrefaçon au Royaume Uni, en France, en Italie et en Espagne, du brevet EP1313508 détenu par Eli Lilly. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
UK Supreme Court moves towards a UK Doctrine of Equivalents in Lilly pemetrexed battle? [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am by Brian Cordery
Thirteen years after the House of Lords had firmly shut the door on any notion of a doctrine extending the scope of patent protection outside the claims, the UK Supreme Court in yesterday’s judgment in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48 reversed gear and reintroduced a true form of doctrine of equivalents into UK law. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am by Brian Cordery
Thirteen years after the House of Lords had firmly shut the door on any notion of a doctrine extending the scope of patent protection outside the claims, the UK Supreme Court in yesterday’s judgment in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48 reversed gear and reintroduced a true form of doctrine of equivalents into UK law. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:14 am by Miquel Montañá
It will suffice to recall that the case stemmed from a complaint filed by Actavis against Eli Lilly in England seeking a declaration of non-infringement affecting not only England but also France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:14 am by Miquel Montañá
It will suffice to recall that the case stemmed from a complaint filed by Actavis against Eli Lilly in England seeking a declaration of non-infringement affecting not only England but also France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court unanimously allowed Lilly’s appeal, holding that the Actavis products would infringe the Patent in the United Kingdom, and in France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:53 am by Brian Cordery
Brian CorderyBy Gregory Bacon The UK Supreme Court announced this morning that it has allowed Eli Lilly’s appeal and held that Actavis’ pemetrexed products directly infringe Lilly’s European patent to pemetrexed disodium in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:53 am by Brian Cordery
Brian CorderyBy Gregory Bacon The UK Supreme Court announced this morning that it has allowed Eli Lilly’s appeal and held that Actavis’ pemetrexed products directly infringe Lilly’s European patent to pemetrexed disodium in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:12 am
"This morning the UK Supreme Court posted a summary of their decision as follows:"The Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:21 am by Brian Cordery
Furthermore, Actavis requested DNIs from the UK court in relation to France, Spain and Italy as well as the UK. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
 Tune in LIVE for tomorrow's Eli Lilly v Actavis Supreme Court showdownThe Supreme Court was live online to hear Tom Mitcheson QC (supported by  Andrew Waugh QC and leading Stuart Baran) for Eli Lilly against Danny Alexander QC (leading Thomas Raphael QC) for Actavis.Oldie but goldie - when is old prior art a suitable starting point for inventive step analysis? [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
 Claire referred to the HGS v Lilly [2011] UKSC 51 and Actavis v Lilly [2015] EWHC 3294 (Pat) cases as examples of patents which did not have data in them and yet were found to be plausible. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
.* Online image search: does France think that the best way to help copyright owners is to deprive them of their rights? [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 1:44 am
 In July 2015, Lilly commenced revocation proceedings in France against the parent and divisional patents. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Higher in Spain than France or Germany. [read post]