Search for: "Line v. Sears and Roebuck and Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2009, 3:02 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., N.D. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:46 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co., the Michigan Supreme Court held that installers of an electric dryer owed no duty to the homeowners with respect to an uncapped natural gas line that had been left by the previous homeowners. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 8:26 am
Glazer and Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 2:54 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., supra, 547 F.3d at 744–46. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Case No. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1549 (Fed. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:35 pm
Sears Roebuck & Co, No. 143329. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:19 am
Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 6:44 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co.] that gave no reasoning and cited no authority whatsoever. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 4:24 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 496 F. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 9:57 am
Direct Lines, Inc., 656 N.E.2d 1101, 1107 (Ill.1995)); see also Phillips v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Bashlin Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:33 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 836 F.2d 515 (Fed. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:10 am
In that case, Lisa Learmonth sued Sears, Roebuck and Co. after she was in a collision with one of the company's vans near Philadelphia, Miss., in 2005. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:10 am
In that case, Lisa Learmonth sued Sears, Roebuck and Co. after she was in a collision with one of the company's vans near Philadelphia, Miss., in 2005. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 12:39 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Case No. 04-CV-7282 (N.D. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:40 am
Sears, Roebuck & Co. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:13 am
Sears Roebuck & Co. case (which resulted in a $6.2 million settlement), offered the following five observations on the EEOC’s view of these policies: An inflexible period of disability leave, even if substantial, is not sufficient to satisfy an employer’s duty of reasonable accommodation. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 727 F.3d 796, 799 (7th Cir.2013) (construing Comcast as holding only “that a damages suit cannot be certified to proceed as a class action unless the damages sought are the result of the class-wide injury that the suit alleges” (emphasis in original)); Leyva v. [read post]
