Search for: "Lisa Lanham"
Results 21 - 40
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
By guest blogger Lisa Ramsey, Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law The Supreme Court will likely hold in Elster that Section 2(c) is consistent with the First Amendment, but will it clarify how to balance trademark and free speech rights? [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 11:20 am
The Ninth Circuit recognized that the Bad Spaniels Toy is “not the equivalent of the Mona Lisa,” but found that it is still expressive. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:31 am
Food & Drug Law Institute Annual Conference Top 20 Cases in Food & Drug Law in 2012 and Cases to Watch in 2013 Bill Janssen, Charleston School of Law: Weddle v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:32 pm
And, as the Supreme Court has unambiguously instructed, the Lanham Act always places the ‘burden of proving likelihood of confusion … on the party charging infringement. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 6:28 am
” The next shoe to drop, it seems, will see courts assessing the constitutionality of other provisions of the Lanham Act. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:16 pm
Redskins attorney Lisa Blatt said in a statement, “The Supreme Court vindicated the team’s position that the First Amendment blocks the government from denying or cancelling a trademark registration based on the government’s opinion. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
Lunney: Congress tried to prevent the Lanham Act from allowing registration of trade dress, and courts and PTO just ignored that. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Some of the Justices, however, seemed inclined to turn to the primary significance test Congress embedded in the cancellation provision of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Hutton, Barbara (1994) Robben Island: Symbol of Resistance. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm
Lisa Ramsey: Do EU lawyers care about clutter? [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
Discussants: Lisa Ramsey Constitutional analysis, not just courts but also Congress! [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
VIP Products LLC (covered in this excellent post by Lisa Ramsey). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 5:40 am
Professor Lisa P. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am
Hargis Industries, a trademark case in which the Court will consider how and where, under the Lanham Act, two parties can litigate the question whether one mark is “likely to cause confusion” with another. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 10:05 am
Lisa Ramsey: are you trying to describe what would happen under the Court’s political speech jurisprudence/strict scrutiny? [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
Outside of this narrow context, the Lanham Act can do great harm to free political speech because it allows for the federal registration of all manner of marks containing pollical commentary. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
Rebecca Tushnet It Depends on What the Meaning of "False" Is: Falsity and Misleadingness in Commercial Speech DoctrineAbstract | Paper My notes: The Lanham Act is about who is to be master of meaning in commercial advertising. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm
(William Hennessy) The problem for VIP was clear from the earliest moments of the argument, as Justices Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and Sonia Sotomayor vied with each other to interrogate Lisa Blatt, representing Jack Daniel’s, about why this toy was unlike anything that Rogers should protect. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
” Lisa Sorenen discusses the opinion at the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:55 am
Migliore claimed to possess an unregistered common law trademark right in the name “Lisa Migliore. [read post]
