Search for: "Little et al v. First Commercial Bank et al" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
The ABA Business Law Section Backgrounder may be accessed HERE. 1UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMANORTHEASTERN DIVISIONNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS )UNITED, d/b/a the NATIONAL )SMALL BUSINESS )ASSOCIATION, et al., ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) Case No. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB)JANET YELLEN, in her official )capacity as Secretary of the )Treasury, et al., ))Defendants. )MEMORANDUM OPINIONThe late Justice Antonin Scalia once remarked that federal judges… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Silja Voeneky, et. al., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence:  Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2022). 82. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 4:27 am by Peter J. Sluka
Less than a week after Hodak filed his dissolution petition, Golan Floors, Ruham, and Hodak were all sued in New York County by Farhadi, a dissatisfied customer who alleged that Golan Floors damaged his furniture and performed seriously substandard work in connection with the restoration of his Chelsea condominium unit (Farhadi v Golan Floors Inc., et al., No. 655203/2019). [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
In cigarette markets, consumers tend to shop across borders where the tax rates are lower and dealers develop black and gray markets to sell illegally to consumers, paying little or no tax at all. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Key Findings Massachusetts’ tax advantage in New England is primarily driven by its competitive individual income tax rate and its sales and use tax structure. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
This was largely motivated by pharmaceutical firms’ commercial considerations, i.e. stronger patent protections usually result in higher drug prices. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
There was little recourse for the SPMs, many of whom went to prison. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
There was little recourse for the SPMs, many of whom went to prison. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
  Statutory safe harbors—or protection from “intermediary liability” as Google might call it–are more than a little reminiscent of the TAZ. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm by opseo
  What that means is that when you go to withdraw your money from an ATM you will be charged by the issuing bank and probably by the bank who owns the ATM. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
Jack, 2018 BCSC 610 where Justice Smith held that Google was not able to show that the global delisting order made against it violated its First Amendment rights in the U.S. or the core values of the U.S. or that the California order undermined the effectiveness of the Equustek order. [read post]