Search for: "Little v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 61 - 80
of 220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
By way of comparison, in 2019 there were 62 federal court securities suits against non-U.S. companies, representing about 15% of all federal court securities suit filings in 2019. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 8:38 am
While there are avenues that could theoretically allow courts to invalidate a political or unscientific grant of an EUA, there is little case law to rely upon. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:18 am
There is little purpose in debating possible structures without a sense of possible IABS roles. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:47 am
Naramore v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Today the European Court of Justice (CJEU) published its highly anticipated judgement in the case of Data Protection Commissioner Ireland v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems, colloquially known as “Schrems 2.0”. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
Resolved – IPSO mediation 02327-20 Lawson v The Gazette (Paisley), Resolved – IPSO mediation Last Week in the Courts On 6 July 2020 Saini J handed down judgment in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2020] EWHC 1778 (QB). [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 pm
“It’s a sad reality that there is no uniform First Amendment-compliant policy nationwide that all law enforcement officers follow [when] they respond to journalists who are covering social or civil unrest,” RTDNA’s Shelley told me. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
To some, the "triumph of... wisdom, philosophy, and reason" sounds like patriarchy and racism.And yet, as we meet here tonight, there is a growing danger that threatens every blessing our ancestors fought so hard for, struggled, they bled to secure. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
FDA Commissioner Stephen M. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
The French parliament has passed a controversial hate speech law that would fine social media companies if they fail to remove certain illegal content within 24 hours and in some cases, as little as one hour. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:57 pm
It includes the American Coronavirus/COVID-19 Election Safety and Security Act, or ACCESS Act. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Data collected by innovative organizations has enormous value and is and can be used to vastly improve our country and its citizens’ economic, social, and personal health, among other things. [read post]
