Search for: "Lloyd's London, Underwriters at" Results 161 - 180 of 391
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2023, 8:12 am by Latosha M. Ellis and Janine A. Hanrahan
Background Mave Hotel Investors LLC (“Mave”) owns a small hotel in Manhattan that was insured by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London (“Lloyd’s”). [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
  For a complete copy of Lloyd’s complaint please click here.In Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
  For a complete copy of Lloyd’s complaint please click here.In Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:47 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
  Eighteen insurers, including Federal Insurance Co., Allianz Underwriters Insurance Co. and Lloyd’s of London, have disputed coverage of the claims. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:18 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Frantic, Inc. v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London case number B326222, in the Court of Appeal in the State of California, Second Appellate District (18 March 2024)] [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 2:35 am
Passive investors can invest in one of the Lloyd’s groups whose shares are listed with the London Stock Exchange, or by simply providing underwriting capital as a corporate member of Lloyd’s and participating with the help of a Lloyd’s members’ agent on one or a number of syndicates. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 11:58 am by Sandra Sithole
(Certain Underwriters of Lloyds v National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al) [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
., insurers at Lloyd's of London and several other companies at least $100 million in claims. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:07 pm
But his assertion has been called into question by the London maritime daily Lloyds List, which published a map based on Lloyds List Intelligence tracking data. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:19 pm by David Kopel
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London (arguing state law, rather than federal common law, should supply the definition of “arbitration” in the Federal Arbitration Act, so to minimize FAA displacement of traditional State authority over contract law). [read post]
27 May 2008, 8:36 am
The Club's position was that Sulpicio's claim could not be brought other than by way of arbitration in London.The Club commenced arbitration proceedings in London based on an arbitration agreement set out in the Rules and then sought from the Commercial Court a permanent anti-suit injunction under Section 37 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 in support of the English arbitration proceedings. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:50 am by Don Cruse
Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, No. 08-0246 (docket and briefs), about whether an insurer is bound to pay for property damage to a third party that its insured (by contract) agreed to assume [under this policy language, it wasn't]. [read post]