Search for: "Lords Construction Inc"
Results 41 - 60
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
The House of Lords in Hood v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 4:11 pm
Texas Keystone, Inc. et al. can be found here. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
In these circumstances and absent an error of principle, an appellate court will be very cautious in differing from the judge's evaluation: see SmithKline Beecham's Patent [2006] RPC 323 at [38] per Lord Hoffmann; Halliburton Energy Services Inc v Smith International (North Sea) Ltd and anor [2006] EWCA Civ 1715 at [24] to [25] per Jacob LJ" 3. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, and Lord Toulson. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 3:13 am
Lord Clarke considered that having regard to “the true construction of the charter [and the] commercial purpose of the clause“, the Vessel was to be on-hire throughout the period of charter, but for some reason associated with NYK or the Vessel. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Macferlan.[4] In that case, even though the defendant had not committed what we would today call a tort or a breach of contract, Lord Mansfield held that the plaintiff could still recover money in an action of assumpsit: “In one word, the gist of this kind of action is, that the defendant, upon the circumstances of the case, is obliged by the ties of natural justice and equity to refund the money. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 6:19 am
It has sometimes an administrative character.13The recent global embrace of judicialization of State and inter-State activities suggests one aspect of this construction. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
I agree with Lord Hoffmann that the new defence is “available to anyone who publishes material of public interest in any medium”: Jameel, at para. 54. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 2:38 am
Fordham 2016: Will purposive construction of Swiss-type claims save second-medical use patents? [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:25 pm
On December 21, 2015, Governor Andrew M. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 10:46 am
Writing the leading judgment, Lord Justice Floyd highlighted two legal points on the construction of patent claims. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
As mentioned above, in comparable situations much of the UK caselaw directs a construction based on accuracy to significant figures, rather than a “whole numbers” approach. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
He also quoted a lovely passage from Lord Hoffmann's speech in Kirin-Amgen:The courts of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Germany certainly discourage, if they do not actually prohibit, use of the patent office file in aid of construction. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:54 am
Bard, Inc., 2015 U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:06 am
It showed a top and side view of the septic tank; details relating to its lid and rise; and matters concerning its construction. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
On appeal, this court affirmed the district court's claim construction and its damages analysis with respect to section 271(f). [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
Canada In the case of Focus Graphite Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:39 am
App. 1921) (where the failure was the installation in a country residence of pipe which was of identical quality but a different brand than the contractually specified pipe) and the House of Lords in Ruxley Electronics & Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
Each of these three suggestions is valuable and constructive, and worthy of an independent paper. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
Each of these three suggestions is valuable and constructive, and worthy of an independent paper. [read post]
