Search for: "Lucasfilm Ltd." Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
Part I of the Star Wars litigation saga was an action brought in the United States by Lucasfilm Ltd, Star Wars Production Ltd and Lucasfilm Entertainment Co Ltd -- the plaintiffs being the production and licensing companies behind the creation of the Star Wars films and the defendants being, respectively, the man who produced military uniforms for the Star Wars movie and the company he owned. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:11 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lucasfilm Ltd appealed against the lower Court’s decision that that the helmet was not a work of sculpture and that the US copyright claims were not justiciable. . [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
Lucasfilm Limited & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Blog Editorial
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina, heard 29 – 30 March 2011. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina, heard 29 – 30 March 2011. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm by Blog Editorial
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina, heard 29 – 30 March 2011. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina, heard 29 – 30 March 2011. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina, heard 29 – 30 March 2011. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:37 pm
Lucasfilm, Ltd.), along with proposed settlement agreements, in D.C. federal court alleging that no-solicit agreements among high-tech employers constituted unlawful restraints on trade in the market for highly-skilled employees in the technology sector. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am by Marie Louise
Ushodaya Enterprises (Spicy IP) Shortened Parliament session and IP Bills (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Israel A few more words on ‘Overlap’ (America-Israel Patent Law) Poland Red dragon vs. red bulls (Class 46) A letter is not enough (Class 46) United Kingdom Innocent … until politely requested to be guilty – Innocent Drinks vs innocent vitamins (IPKat) Copyright in currency: taking note of the Bank of England (1709 Blog) Supreme Court – Star Wars: the hearing:… [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 9:19 pm by Patent Docs
The Symposium will offer panel discussions on the following topics: • 9:15 - 10:15 am -- "Intellectual Property in the Modern Boardroom: Major Issues Facing General Counsels, CEO's and Boards in Today's Corporations" Moderated by Scott Kieff, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, GW Law School Panelists: Dave Anderman, General Counsel, Lucasfilm Ltd. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:23 am by Antitrust Today
Department of Justice’s crusade against anticompetitive employment practices at high-tech companies continues, this time with a settlement with Lucasfilm Ltd. [read post]