Search for: "Lucent Technologies Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2009, 3:10 pm
For example, Microsoft recently dodged a $357 million jury award bullet in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:27 pm
Adobe Systems, Inc., et al, 6:09cv446 (7/19/12) Alcatel-Lucent v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 8:49 am
The district court held that the plaintiff's expert's testimony ran afoul of the Federal Circuit's decision in Lucent Technologies v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:20 pm
RWS-KNM ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC., ET AL., 2017 U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:01 pm
Lucent Technologies Inc. has declined to address the continuing viability of the de novo standard for judicial estoppel. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:36 am
Lucent Technologies v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:14 am
Plaintiff Labyrinth Optical Technologies LLC ("Labyrinth") filed a patent infringement action against Defendant Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:09 pm
The case -- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 5:18 am
Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:38 am
ResQNet.com, Inc prevailed over Lansa, except on the amount of damages. [read post]
28 Dec 2005, 8:20 am
RATES TECHNOLOGY INC. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 6:27 am
While Lucent argues that "the record was replete with evidence that the HQ encoder will be invoked as a result of common conditions that occur routinely in practice," as the Federal Circuit noted in E-Pass Technologies, Inc. v. 3Com Corp., 473 F.3d 1213, 1223 (Fed. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 6:45 am
PrecisionFlow Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
" Bandag, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:52 am
[W]ithout evidence that there is a market for this add-in, the add-ins analysis does not meet the requirement for damages being based on 'sound economic and factual predicates.'" Lucent Technologies, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 2:37 pm
Transaction Tracking Technologies, Inc., 2:07cv311 (Ed. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:49 pm
Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 12:21 am
Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
Taken on its face, the statement seems overbroad and potentially problematic for the reason set forth by another Federal Circuit panel in Lucent Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 1:52 pm
Malcolm Wells has more than 25 years experience with companies including Litigation Solution, Inc., AT&T, Lucent Technologies, Avaya and CUW LitSupport a premier training organization for litigation support software packages, including Summation, Trial Director and Sanction. [read post]
