Search for: "Lujan v. Does"
Results 81 - 100
of 174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 8:15 am
The Court’s Reasoning First, the court concluded that the plaintiffs had standing under Lujan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:11 pm
Bolton, 185 S.W.3d 868, 878-79 (Tex. 2005); Lujan v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 3:03 pm
Citing the Court's decision in Lujan v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 8:08 am
The court employs the federal Lujan v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:03 pm
” And while Congress “may ‘elevat[e] to the status of legally cognizable injuries concrete, de facto injuries that were previously inadequate in law’” (citing Lujan v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:43 pm
This was discussed most fervently during the oral argument in First American Financial v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:44 pm
The following Mass v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm
Franklin v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:01 pm
The injuries asserted satisfy the Lujan v.. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 1:16 pm
Two of Circuit Judge Barretts cases are cited: Lujan v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 2:14 am
Lujan v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:11 am
Lujan v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 10:18 pm
See Lujan v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:10 am
Wong (2008) __ Cal.App.4th __ (formerly entitled Lujan v. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
Lujan v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:29 pm
” Quoting Lujan v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 3:33 pm
The United States Supreme Court explained the three legal elements of standing in the case of Lujan v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:21 pm
Lujan, 504 U.S. at 56 NAHB does not explain, however, how the TNW Determination adversely affects either the “manner” of regulation or, with any specificity, the “types of watercourses” subject to regulation. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 6:32 am
Lujan, 361 S.W.3d 147, 152–53 (Tex.App. [read post]
