Search for: "M&M Development LLC " Results 81 - 100 of 2,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2016, 4:41 pm by Patricia Salkin
Defendant/appellant, 310 Investments, LLC (“310”), owned property located in a business park developed by plaintiff/appellee, Esperanza Land, LLC. 310’s property was subject to Esperanza’s recorded building restrictions. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
While I’m not aware of any New York cases directly addressing the issue, a recent decision by Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle of the Tennessee Business Court in Wilford v Coltea, Case No. 15-856-BC [Tenn. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 7:31 pm by Patricia Salkin
The determination at issue was the approval of an incentive zoning application by respondents-defendants M & F, LLC, Daniele SPC, LLC, Mucca Mucca, LLC, Mardanth Enterprises, Inc., and Daniele Management, LLC – collectively doing business as Daniele Family Companies – in connection with a proposed Whole Foods store in respondent-defendant Town of Brighton. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 3:33 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The operating agreement’s “purpose” clause stated that the LLC was formed “to develop and operate a restaurant . . . [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 3:33 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The operating agreement’s “purpose” clause stated that the LLC was formed “to develop and operate a restaurant . . . [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Corporate and LLC Consents Required for Mergers and Acquisitions Checklist (DE) Review the necessary corporate and LLC consent requirements under Delaware law for a variety of M&A transactions, along with links to templates to get started. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:46 pm by Tyson Snow
(I’m not sure Mumford West & Snow LLC has a real website at this point–but that is nothing more than an aside.) [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
Among the many developing areas of the law of LLCs addressed in the treatise is the application of “veil piercing” principles, originally developed as part of the common law of business corporations, to enable creditors of LLCs, under certain circumstances involving abuse of the LLC form, to satisfy LLC obligations with the personal assets of the LLC owners. [read post]