Search for: "M/V LORD" Results 61 - 80 of 914
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
A v Cornwall Council [2017] EWHC 842 (QB). [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  For questions, contact Alexandra M. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 12:47 am by Frank Cranmer
: on the recent decisions in Onuoha v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust and Kovalkovs v 2 Sisters Food Group Limited. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 10:40 am by Jack Bogdanski
The 2018 decision on the subject is Martin v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am by familoo
I emphasise that I’m not a CoP lawyer. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:11 am by Florian Mueller
I remember all too well how Lord Justice Kitchin gave a speech at Munich's Ludwig Maximilian University in early 2019 which was essentially just a defense of his own Unwired v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
At a meeting held in the House of Lords on 8 June 2022, the Campaign group FAIR (Falsely Accused Individuals for Reform) called for pre-charge naming of sexual offence suspects to be made a criminal offence in England and Wales. [read post]
10 May 2022, 6:49 am by J
I’m not sure about this. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
  Humanist weddings On Monday, there was a short debate in the Lords on humanist marriages – or their absence – in England and Wales. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am by INFORRM
In A v M, there are only a couple of paragraphs explaining Mostyn J’s position, and in BT v CU only a dozen or so. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
 Dado, La Grande Ferme--Homage à Bernard Réquichot (1962-3); CentrePompidou  It was my great honor to have been asked to participate in the brilliant Conference "The Life and Work of Robert M. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
In practice, s97 is most often relaxed where a child is missing or abducted and there is a need for a public appeal featuring the child’s name and picture, but there are occasional examples of the relaxation of s97 in other circumstances, including where there is no direct positive benefit to the child (see Al M (Children) [2020] EWCA Civ 283, and Griffiths v Tickle). [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 12:56 pm by fjhinojosa
Beyer is quoted, and his article Will Contests—Prediction and Prevention is cited in the following case: Matter of Last Will and Testament of Beard v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 5:24 am by Russell Knight
A “court [can] reserve the issue of child support until [a spouse is] employed and order[ that spouse] to maintain a job diary” Shen v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm by AAEPA
Kings Chance En règle générale, les avantages envoient des bonus à une hausse de plafond de retraits, et même de nombreuses invitations à un ensemble de évènements privées. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 7:34 pm
Lord and undeposable ruler, perfection int he house of wisdom, Lord infinite in knowledge, we who fail to know you  fully will fail, if we could but know you fully, all would be well with us.] [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
Former Today editor Sarah Sands has told the House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee that the BBC is “institutionally statist,” that is, leaning towards more government spending as a solution to crisis. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 2:18 am by Robin Stewart
Lord Justice Lewison referred to the case of Collier v P & M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1329, [2018] 1 WLR 643 where the phrase “grounds which appear to the court to be substantial” was considered but in the context of insolvency proceedings. [read post]