Search for: "M/V LORD" Results 101 - 120 of 914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2010, 6:03 pm
Dear Rich: I'm creating a cartoon world which contains several coined words describing things, actions and types of creatures, a little bit like Tolkien's "Lord Of The Rings". [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:36 am by steve cornforth blog
Shortly before my arrival, the Law Centre had taken the case of Irwin v Liverpool City Council to the House of Lords. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Lord Neuberger reviewed a long list of authorities of the House of Lords, the Privy Council and that of the Court of Appeal in Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar NP [1984] FSR 413, 462. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:05 am
Readers may remember this dispute as Sun Microsystems Inc v M-Tech Data Ltd and another (noted by the IPKat here), but it has resurfaced today -- at a time when Court of Appeal judges should be out in the sun, not judging it -- as Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein [2010] EWCA Civ 997. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
This week saw the announcement of the dissolution of the long established media law set, 1 Brick Court, headed by Lord Garnier QC. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 10:17 am by Giles Peaker
The second and third grounds of appeal were “The Recorder failed to have regard to paragraphs 5 and 6 of Lord Diplock’s guidance in American Cyanamid v Ethicon (1975) AC 396. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 8:18 pm
 I'm one of those folks who thinks that Santa Fe Independent School District v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
The House of Lords Opinions in Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 were handed down today. [read post]
18 May 2008, 3:35 pm
Doherty v Birmingham in the Lords will give some clarification, but it is going to be fun in the County Courts for a while. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
Small in 1838, through Rylands and Fletcher, through M’ALISTER or DONOGHUE (Pauper) v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  And on 21 September 2021, a majority of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales (Lord Justice Arnold and Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing, Lord Justice Birss dissenting) upheld a decision of the High Court which agreed with the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) that Thaler’s applications should be deemed withdrawn because of his failure to identify a natural person as inventor (Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents Trade Marks And Designs [2021] EWCA Civ… [read post]
1 May 2017, 6:43 am by Peter Groves
Neither has the judge dancing in the aisle, and I'm left with the feeling that I would want to punish any political party that inflicted either piece on me. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  And on 21 September 2021, a majority of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales (Lord Justice Arnold and Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing, Lord Justice Birss dissenting) upheld a decision of the High Court which agreed with the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) that Thaler’s applications should be deemed withdrawn because of his failure to identify a natural person as inventor (Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents Trade Marks And Designs [2021] EWCA Civ… [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:42 am by Bartolus
The Court of Justice recently narrowed the scope of EU measures taken to freeze the funds of designated terrorist organizations in Case C-340/08 M v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
, 5th Münster Colloquia on EU Law and the Digital Economy V, Nomos/Hart, 2020, Andreas Sattler, Faculty of Law. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
DonovanRethinking People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]