Search for: "M/V LORD" Results 141 - 160 of 914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
R(Ahmad) v LB Newham [2009] UKHL 14 is now available and the Lords have done a pretty good job at destroying the jurisprudence built up by the High Court and Court of Appeal in Part 6 cases. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm by Charon QC
I’m not saying it’s all fixed, but the Gordonion Knot starting to loosen itself? [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:13 am by Isobel Williams
Today’s case, Moohan and another v The Lord Advocate, has been parachuted in because of the urgent time-scale. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:11 am by Dave
In Guiste v Lambeth LBC (2019) EWCA Civ 1758, the Court of Appeal returned again to the meaning of Lord Neuberger’s eliptical phrase in Hotak v Southwark LBC that, for the purposes of the homelessness provisions in the Housing Act 1996, vulnerability meant being significantly more vulnerable than ordinarily vulnerable as a result of being made homeless. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 4:21 pm
I’m eagerly awaiting the judgment in R(Weaver) v London & Quadrant, but, in one of those quirks of synchronicity, Bailii has just put the Court of Appeal Judgment in Donoghue v Poplar Housing & Regeneration Community Association Ltd & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 595 up online. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 1 December 2017, Langstaff J handed down judgment in the case of Various Claimants v W M Morrisons Supermarket plc [2017] EWHC 3113 (QB). [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:49 am by Chukwuma Okoli
V&R unipress; Bonn University Press (2021) xvi and 230pp. plus 1 p. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Mr Justice Bean, in Mengi v Hermitage [2012] EWHC 3445 (QB) (“Cet animal est tres méchant; Quand on l’attaque, il se defend”). [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Blog Editorial
  The appeals in Her Majesty’s Advocate v Ambrose, Her Majesty’s Advocate v G, Her Majesty’s Advocate v M and Her Majesty’s Advocate v P will be heard over three days commencing on Tuesday 28 June 2011 by Lords Hope, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Clarke (Scotland). [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smolin, Kids Are Not Cakes: A Children's Rights Perspective on Fulton v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:09 am by J
Well, we now have another (minor) comment on the issue from Lord Justice Kitchin in Faizi v Greenside Properties Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1382 (only on Case Track from what I can see).Mr & Mrs Farzi appear to have been the leasehold owners of a flat in a building owned by Greenside. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:09 am by J
Well, we now have another (minor) comment on the issue from Lord Justice Kitchin in Faizi v Greenside Properties Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1382 (only on Case Track from what I can see).Mr & Mrs Farzi appear to have been the leasehold owners of a flat in a building owned by Greenside. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Events 16 January 2018, “Various Claimants v W M Morrison Ltd: Opening the data breach floodgates? [read post]