Search for: "M-I L.L.C." Results 61 - 80 of 195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Seven-Factor Balancing Test The amendment codifies the Texas Supreme Court’s holding in In re M-I L.L.C., which sets out a seven-factor balancing test that courts must consider before excluding a party or a party’s representative at any stage of the proceedings, including discovery, pretrial, or trial. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 7:01 am by Leiza Dolghih
” Additionally, come September, Texas courts will have to apply a balancing test first articulated in  In re M-I, L.L.C., 505 S.W.3d 569 (Tex. 2016) when determining whether a party involved in a trade secrets lawsuit can be denied access to documents or testimony about its competitor’s trade secrets. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:16 pm
Mladenovic drew the check on his own company's account, RCS Greater Cleveland L.L.C. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am by Brittan J. Bush
Flat River Farms, L.L.C., the Louisiana Second Circuit addressed issues affecting the creation and preservation of mineral servitudes and payment of court costs in a concursus action.[1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am by Brittan J. Bush
Flat River Farms, L.L.C., the Louisiana Second Circuit addressed issues affecting the creation and preservation of mineral servitudes and payment of court costs in a concursus action.[1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am by Brittan J. Bush
Flat River Farms, L.L.C., the Louisiana Second Circuit addressed issues affecting the creation and preservation of mineral servitudes and payment of court costs in a concursus action.[1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am by Brittan J. Bush
Flat River Farms, L.L.C., the Louisiana Second Circuit addressed issues affecting the creation and preservation of mineral servitudes and payment of court costs in a concursus action.[1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 7:31 am
” The Tenant responded, “I thought I made it clear to you that I wasnot involved in your operation when I returned your keys to you last May. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm by Alex Loomis
Rather than argue that this reading of Zivotofsky I is the best interpretation of that case, in this post I'm going to review U.S. appellate court political question jurisprudence since Zivotofsky I and ask if that case changed the lower courts' analysis. [read post]