Search for: "M. Richard Warner"
Results 81 - 100
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Other Caselaw: I’m roughly going to follow the outline of my copyright course, though the emphasis will be on new and interesting cases rather than trying to cover all the aspects of the course. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 5:47 pm
The whistleblower explains that he was not a firsthand witness to the conversation between Trump and Zelensky but, instead, that he received word from “[m]ultiple White House officials with direct knowledge of the call” who “were deeply disturbed by what had transpired in the phone call. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:45 am
Warners; Richards (someone wanted to make a new dictionary from another’s)); 111 fair use findings, 40 did not find transformativeness and 7 explicitly found nontransformativeness. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 7:30 am
(Richard Marx, whose song "Now and Forever" was one of those that Thomas-Rasset downloaded, issued a statement in which he said, "I'm ashamed to have my name associated with this issue. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
In the case of Hobbs v Warner, 2019 BCSC 2196 Donegan J dismissed a defamation claim under SLAPP legislation. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Richard Burgess, Am. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
The Trinity Legal Term ended on Friday 29 July 2022. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 9:32 am
Warner Huh, a gynecologic oncologist. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 6:05 am
MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith: We had an initial meeting with Richard Allen a V.P. of global policy for Facebook in London in November December of last year and then so this is the second major meeting. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:12 am
Still a Waiting Game - http://bit.ly/OpZFiQ (Michael Hamilton) Criminal Search Warrants Showing Their Age - http://bit.ly/MP6MDm (BLLAWG) Da Silva Moore: Defendant Files Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Objection to Denial of Motion for Recusal or Disqualification – http://bit.ly/Q6WTOT (K&L Gates) ECA – Before 26(f) - http://bit.ly/LZlGaL (Samantha Green) eDiscovery Traffic Control – Merging on the Litigation Superhighway… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:45 am
(The following President’s column appeared in the December 2011 issue of the Georgia Bar Journal.) [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 7:57 pm
Testimonials Over the years Tom has been gratified by the letters and e-mails he has received from lawyers, both those he has worked with while an in-house marketer, and while a consultant. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
"I'm a victim of soicumstance! [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Mike Wendy and I have just released a new PFF white paper, “The Constructive Alternative to Net Neutrality Regulation and Title II Reclassification Wars. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 11:56 am
Pending before the Supreme Court on that day was a similar case, Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
" J&M Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 5:55 am
This year, a proposal, the Tobacco Tax Equity Act, from Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) is gaining traction. [1] The proposal would increase rates on cigarettes by 100 percent and increase the rates on all other tobacco and nicotine products to achieve parity with the rate on cigarettes. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
