Search for: "MAPP v. COURT"
Results 61 - 80
of 218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2009, 8:29 pm
Previous Supreme Court rulings, including Mapp v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
I assume the same would hold true for the court’s ruling in McDonald v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:18 pm
But he also said that the Court should reconsider whether the exclusionary rule applies to the States (a rule that has been in existence since 1961, when the Court decided Mapp v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:20 am
But that is not the question presented, so reexamination of Mapp must wait for another day.City of Hays v. [read post]
20 Jun 2006, 2:19 pm
"The criminal prosecution of officers is never going to happen," he said, citing Mapp v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
Mapp v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:33 pm
For example, one study trying to determine the impact of Mapp v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:18 am
June 15, 1961 was the day that Mapp v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
It cites, for example, Katz and Wong Sun, Weeks and Carroll, Mapp v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:14 pm
Connick v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:32 am
It has been 50 years since the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Mapp v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:35 pm
At the trial the court determined whether there was probable cause for the arrest. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 10:07 am
United States and Mapp v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 7:56 am
Ken Armstrong of the Marshall Project reports on the passing of Dollree Mapp, the petitioner in Mapp v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:10 pm
Accept nominees who question Mapp v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
In North Carolina, the significance of a vehicle’s mobility was discounted by the North Carolina Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:13 pm
Relying on Mapp v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 9:04 pm
If Mapp is authority, that was with a search warrant, so the rule is different. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:06 am
The case in question was Evenwel v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
Sundby has published a paper, entitled "Mapp v. [read post]
