Search for: "MAPP v. COURT" Results 61 - 80 of 217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2016, 9:14 pm by Miriam Baer
This year, I decided to begin the semester with Boyd v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 10:07 am by Kent Scheidegger
  (In the latter, it is crystal clear that fidelity to the original understanding would require overruling Mapp v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  I will keep on keeping on.The Fourth AmendmentAll four search-and-seizure cases involve questions of the substantive reach of the Fourth Amendment, not the remedy of exclusion of evidence under Mapp v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant's Motion to Suppress or Preclude Evidence Defendant's motion for a Huntley/Mapp/Dunaway/Payton hearing is granted. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant's motion to preclude impeachment evidence, People v Sandoval 34 NY2d 371 (1974), and evidence-in-chief of prior bad acts, People v Ventimiglia 52 NY2d 350 (1981), is referred to the trial court for hearings immediately prior to trial. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:23 am by Mark Siesel
However, when the case of Mapp v Ohio was heard in June of 1961, it took on much greater significance, and became one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:23 am by Mark Siesel
However, when the case of Mapp v Ohio was heard in June of 1961, it took on much greater significance, and became one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:23 am by Mark Siesel
However, when the case of Mapp v Ohio was heard in June of 1961, it took on much greater significance, and became one of the most important decisions in the history of the Court. [read post]