Search for: "MARINE POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES, INC."
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2013, 7:43 am
(See, Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:03 am
Cir, 2012). 8 Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:20 am
CAFC Muddle: Deciphering the Marine Polymer En Banc Ruling*Where the en banc decision gets particularly interesting (and adversarial) is with respect to the second question, namely when does “intervening rights” apply to reexamined claims? [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
The post points out two major caveats in the decision. 4) Patent Docs: Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
The post points out two major caveats in the decision. 4) Patent Docs: Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:59 pm
Noonan -- In a decision ripe for Supreme Court review (appropriately, this time), a fractured Federal Circuit delivered a plurality opinion in Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
Following a controversial panel decision last September in Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
Following a controversial panel decision last September in Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:01 am
Last week, the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, gave a shot in the arm to patentees with regard to the "intervening rights" doctrine in its Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. decision. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 1:00 am
On March 15, 2012, the en banc Federal Circuit issued a divided decision in Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:33 pm
The case of Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 1:10 am
Back in September, in Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:43 am
The Federal Circuit has agreed to rehear the Marine Polymer case en banc later this year. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:18 am
Mandrusiak all of OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P.[1] The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is currently considering en banc the panel decision in Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:10 am
Whether or not a claim change in post grant patent proceeding results in the an intervening rights defense is far from a straightforward determination as evidenced by the recent decision Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:38 pm
On September 26, 2011, the a three-judge-panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a ruling in Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:10 am
Disclaimer Results in Reversal of $56 Million Dollar Damage Award As previously discussed, the CAFC has agreed to reconsider Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:53 am
CAFC– The court has agreed to reconsider Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
By way of background, the Complainants in this investigation are Apple Inc. and NeXT Software, Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
Highlights this week included: ACTA signing begins (Spicy IP) (Ars Technica) (Public Knowledge) (Spicy IP) (ipwars.com) (Michael Geist) (Out-Law) (Michael Geist) The Unified Patent Court: EPLAW Resolution on the Draft Agreement (EPLAW) (PatLit) (IPEG) (IAM) CAFC finds intervening rights created by post grant disclaimer: Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
