Search for: "MARK P. SULLIVAN"
Results 101 - 120
of 179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
Though this would mark an enormous sea change in historical practice, it gets the U.S. better aligned with most of its allies’ military systems. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
Wash. 2003)(“P-values measure the probability that the reported association was due to chance… . [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
McGregor (Indiana-Indianapolis), Mark E. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:45 am
Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173, 199 n.5, 111 S. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
It was a bad trip, since Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 10:35 am
Robertson, a 14-page opinion (including a dissent by Judge Robb beginning on p. 12), Judge Sullivan writes:Appellant-Petitioner, James Nye, challenges the trial court's order invalidating a testamentary trust provision in his mother's will as an illegal restraint of marriage and awarding his step-father, Appellee Lynn Robertson, a life-estate in the real estate at issue. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:25 am
Richard Pérez-Peña reports for the New York Times. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
Sullivan, 169 N.J. 204, 210 (2001); State v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Sullivan that he criticized last year. [read post]
15 May 2007, 1:57 pm
Frankel and Mark L. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Konin and Mark S. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:05 pm
"But as Santa Mateo County, Calif., District Attorney James P. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:19 am
David Goodman, Edgar Sandoval, Miriam Jordan, and Eileen Sullivan report for the New York Times. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Ct. at 760-61 (citations and quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added).Holding that registering to do business/appointing an agent for service of process is enough to create general personal jurisdiction is every bit as “grasping” and “exorbitant” as the theory rejected in Bauman – and for the same reasons. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
It would have made Feist different, though it could have been a statutory interpretation case.Lisa P. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
Sullivan,[27] false remarks are actionable where the speaker shows "reckless disregard" of whether a defamatory statement about a public official is false or not, and there is sufficient evidence to support a finding the speaker seriously doubted the truth of his publication.[28] Under both the Sullivan standard and FCC broadcast regulations, foreseeability and intent are key to deciding if legal sanction is acceptable and/or constitutional. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 11:36 am
O'Sullivan, David P. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:59 am
The transit marked the second time in just over three weeks that a U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
The Ninth Circuit held that the Sullivan and Gertz standards apply whether the defendant is "media" or a "professional journalist" or not. [read post]
