Search for: "MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC."
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2009, 10:53 am
A little late but from Law.com comes IP Suit Against Marvell Semiconductor Dismissed for Lack of Standing and the end of one case: Jasmine Networks Inc.'s epic trade secret case against Marvell Semiconductor Inc., featuring a general counsel's accidental voice mail confession, was suddenly dismissed (.pdf) Wednesday. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 5:00 pm
Marvell Semiconductor Inc. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 5:03 am
Carnegie Mellon University ("CMU") filed a patent infringement action Marvell Technology Group and Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:52 am
In this patent infringement case brought by Carnegie Mellon University ("CMU"), against Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. and Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 8:39 am
Four years ago Matthew Gloss, the general counsel of Marvell Semiconductor Inc., and two of his colleagues phoned the legal chief of a rival company, Jasmine Networks Inc. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 7:36 am
A jury in the Western District of Pennsylvania returned a verdict in favor of Carnegie Melon University and against Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. and Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:49 am
Four years ago Matthew Gloss, the general counsel of Marvell Semiconductor Inc., and two of his colleagues phoned the legal chief of a rival company, Jasmine Networks Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
Section 1832 for the theft of Marvell Semiconductor Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
Section 1832 for the theft of Marvell Semiconductor Inc. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 7:06 am
Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., 3-12-cv-04967 (CAND April 14, 2014, Order) (Orrick, J.) [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 7:41 am
Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., 3-12-cv-04967 (CAND August 28, 2014, Order) (Orrick, J.) [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 4:00 pm
This was, you might recall, the wacky case in which the general counsel of Marvell Semiconductor Inc. and two of his colleagues phoned the legal chief of a rival company, Jasmine Networks Inc. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 4:00 pm
This was, you might recall, the wacky case in which the general counsel of Marvell Semiconductor Inc. and two of his colleagues phoned the legal chief of a rival company, Jasmine Networks Inc. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:54 am
By Robin Cleary After nine years of protracted litigation, a Santa Clara jury unanimously decided that Marvell Semiconductor Inc. did not misappropriate Jasmine Network Inc.'s trade secrets and did not violate a non-disclosure agreement according to published reports. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:49 pm
Marvell Semiconductor Inc., S124914, Marvell attorneys had argued Jasmine wasn't entitled to use a voice mail that Matthew Gloss -- Marvell's former general counsel -- and two colleagues had inadvertently left on the telephone of Jasmine's top lawyer. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 8:11 am
Microsoft Corporation, Intel Corporation, Marvell Technology Group Ltd., Marvell Semiconductor Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., et al. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:07 am
Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., Jasmine sued Marvell and several of Marvell's employees for misappropriation of trade secrets and related causes of action based on allegations that Marvel had wrongfully acquired Jasmine’s trade secrets and hired away key employees, destroying or greatly reducing the value of Jasmine's trade secrets. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:30 am
I see it going to a severe civil, civil layer, but not...Gloss: But still hits, would still hit the financial.The ABA Journal is reporting that this trade secrets misappropriation case that relies partly on a general counsel's mistaken voice mail message has been tossed after a late-hour dismissal motion argued a lack of standing.Santa Clara, Calif., Superior Court Judge Thomas Edwards ruled yesterday that Jasmine Networks Inc. can't sue Marvell Semiconductor… [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 1:48 pm
(Jasmine) brought this action charging Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. [read post]
16 May 2012, 1:49 pm
The evidence presented against Zhang during trial showed that, while employed as a project engineer for Netgear, Inc., he accessed the secure database of Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., downloading information with the intent of using that information after accepting a job at Marvell’s chief competitor, Broadcom Corporation and later loading Marvell’s trade secret information onto his Broadcom laptop. [read post]
