Search for: "MAY v. OBAMA et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
U.S. et al. are very much a part of the 2016 presidential contest. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 10:45 am
Geithner, et al. [read post]
22 May 2018, 8:07 am
Murphy Oil USA, Inc., et al., No. 16-307 (May 21, 2018). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
The plaintiffs have two main arguments, which they summarize: The Act improperly authorizes that civilians in the United States be detained indefinitely by the military, that they be tried by military commission or military court and that they may be subject to removal to other jurisdictions in violation of the Amendments V and VI of the Constitution. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 9:24 am
Obama, et al. (08-1234), which concerns "whether judges may require the release of Guantanamo prisoners to live in the U.S. itself, which is a case with "broader implications for all issues surrounding release or transfer of detainees. [read post]
8 May 2010, 10:39 am
Gill et al. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 3:10 pm
Obama, et al. can be read here. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:41 pm
Actavis Inc. et al. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 7:49 am
That raises the stakes on the case of Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:14 pm
Thomas More Law Center, et al. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:34 am
Al-Odah v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 4:17 pm
The government opposition brief, filed Monday in Plame Wilson, et al., v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:02 pm
Obama, et al. (08-1234). [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
Obama, et al. (08-1234). [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:39 pm
In a much anticipated filing with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal in State of Nevada, et a. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 8:35 am
Clean Air Council, et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
(DuPont Co., et al., v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:23 am
Supreme Court, in 14 Penn Plaza LLC et al. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 10:10 am
The petition for further review in Mohamed,et al, v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:56 am
After noticing that the Court had issued no order on the case of Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]
