Search for: "MERCK & CO., INC. "
Results 41 - 60
of 673
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2018, 6:00 pm
by Dennis Crouch Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:28 pm
9, 2007 - Merck & Co., Inc. today announced that it has entered into an agreement with the law firms that comprise the executive committee of the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee of the federal multidistrict VIOXX litigation as well as representatives of plaintiffs' counsel in state coordinated proceedings to resolve state and federal myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke claims already filed against the Company in the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 7:33 am
Merck & Co., Inc., No. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:20 am
Today's post was shared by FairWarning and comes from www.reuters.com By Nate Raymond and Jessica DyeNEW YORK Dec 9 (Reuters) - Merck & Co Inc said on Monday that it was prepared to pay $27.7 million to settle lawsuits by hundreds of people who sued the company over allegations that its osteoporosis drug Fosamax caused bones in the jaw to deteriorate.Lawyers for Merck and plaintiffs disclosed the proposed settlement at a court hearing in New York to resolve… [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 6:55 pm
On Friday, Merck & Co., Inc. announced that it had agreed to settle thousands of lawsuits filed against the company by patients who took Vioxx and suffered either a heart attack or stroke. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:52 pm
• Defendants: Merck & Co., Inc.; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.; N.V. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:30 am
Zambri, founding member and partner The AP (11/2) reported Merck & Co. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 4:02 pm
Sleet) in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 3:42 pm
(Reporting by Ben Hirschler; Editing by Crispian Balmer)[Click here to see the rest of this post]Found onRelated articlesChemical at Goodyear Plant Linked to Bladder Cancer in 50 Workers (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Medical Device Litigation: Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:54 am
Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 5:22 am
Merck & Co., Inc., 195 N.J. 51 (2008), rejected an ambitious attempt to force pharmaceutical manufacturer Merck to... [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 10:49 am
Edison Co. v.NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938)). [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:43 pm
Merck will receive Insmed's follow-on biologics platform, and its development and production facility located in Boulder, CO. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:37 pm
United States and here for Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:47 am
Not having to pay as much as its rival, Merck & Co, Pfizer is planning on ending 92 percent of its law suits with this agreement. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:24 am
Some other recent settlements have been paid by GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer Inc., Eli Lilly & Co., and AstraZeneca. [read post]
17 May 2016, 11:25 am
About 4,400 Cases Still Pending In Federal Court MDL As Well As New Jersey And California State Courts (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) In their corporate report Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2016, Merck & Co., Inc. provided investors and others with their most recent update about what has been going on (or has not been, as it might seem to be the situation) with the thousands of Fosamax - femur fracture cases filed against the drug… [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:15 am
Patent 6,881,745 over its objection that the petition for inter partes review (IPR) filed by Merck Sharpe & Dohme (MSD) was fatally defective for having omitted parent corporation Merck & Co., Inc. as a real-party-in-interest. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments today in Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:04 pm
Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
