Search for: "MERCK & CO., INC. " Results 61 - 80 of 674
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2019, 8:03 pm by Dennis Crouch
” The decision in Acorda falls in line with the court’s 2005 decision in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by Brian Corcoran
Their argument cited ongoing litigation in Mondelez International, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
 She has authored and co-authored numerous books including the How to Understand Statutes and Regulations, Annotated Federal Interpretation Act, The Practical Guide to Canadian Legal Research, Introduction to the Law and Legal System of Canada, and Updating Statutes and Regulations for all Canadian Jurisdictions. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
At Reuters, Andrew Chung reports that the justices “appeared sympathetic to Merck & Co in its bid to fend off hundreds of lawsuits accusing the company of failing to adequately warn patients of the risks of thigh bone fractures associated with its osteoporosis drug Fosamax. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 12:57 am by Eszter Szakács
Eszter SzakácsCo-author: Zsolt Lengyel, Danubia Patent and Law Office Just a few months before the CJEU’s judgment in C-121/17 Teva UK Ltd and Others v Gilead Sciences Inc. came out a the Metropolitan Court of Budapest handed down a decision regarding Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp’s (MSD) application for an SPC re the combination of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 10:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Roxane was that Acorda lost:Roxane Laboratories, Inc.; Mylan Pharmaceuticals,Inc.; and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., have submittedAbbreviated New Drug Applications seeking FDAapproval to market generic versions of Ampyra. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 3:08 am by Brian Cordery
To recap, what are now known as Arrow declarations originate from the decision in Arrow Generics Ltd & Anor v Merck & Co, Inc [2007] EWHC 1900 (Pat), in which the High Court held that it had the discretion to grant a declaration that a medicinal product was obvious at the priority date. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 11:55 pm by admin
Merck and Co., Inc., 110 Nev. 762, 878 P.2d 948 (1994) (Public policy demands that the burden of accidental injuries caused by products intended for consumption be placed upon those that market them and be treated as a cost of production against which liability insurance can be obtained). [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 11:55 pm by admin
Merck and Co., Inc., 110 Nev. 762, 878 P.2d 948 (1994) (Public policy demands that the burden of accidental injuries caused by products intended for consumption be placed upon those that market them and be treated as a cost of production against which liability insurance can be obtained). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
But Phillips and McCauley had a falling-out, and Phillips started posting allegations that McCauley was actually soft on the anti-vaccination movement and was actually "shillin for Merck"; part of his rhetoric was that anti-vaccination people had to save Ella from McCauley, who wasn't adequately protecting her from the evils of vaccines. [read post]