Search for: "MERCK & CO., INC. " Results 121 - 140 of 674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2011, 5:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Related to Merck's large layoff, the Newark Star-Ledger noted that New Jersey's Department of Labor and Workforce Development schedules events at companies that announce large downsizings to teach employees how to access unemployment insurance and explore other employment optionsOn July 21, 2011: Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, N.J., , acting through an affiliate and known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, and China's Simcere… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:00 am by admin
Supreme Court April 27 ruled unanimously that shareholders in Merck & Co. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 9:12 pm by Patent Docs
Paul Jahn of Morrison & Foerster LLP; William Krovatin of Merck & Co., Inc.; and Richard Rainey of Covington & Burling LLP will explore the significant ramifications of the recent U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 5:22 am
Merck & Co., Inc. has announced a voluntary recall of two of its Haemophilus influenza type b (Hib) vaccines, PedvaxHIB® (monovalent Hib vaccine) and COMVAX® (Hib/hepatitis B vaccine), and won't resume distribution until the fourth quarter of 2008. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:58 am by Sean Wajert
Merck & Co., Inc, 929 A.2d 1076, 1088 (N.J. 2007); Mirkin v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 9:08 am
Only Pfizer Inc.'s Celebrex remains on the market, and it now carries the Food and Drug Administration's strongest warning label. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am by Adeline Chong
Guest post by Professor Yeo Tiong Min, SC (honoris causa), Yong Pung How Chair Professor of Law, Yong Pung How School of Law, Singapore Management University Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (formerly known as Merck & Co, Inc) v Merck KGaA (formerly known as E Merck) [2021] 1 SLR 1102, [2021] SGCA 14 (“Merck”), noted previously, is a landmark case in Singapore private international law, being a decision of a full bench of the… [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:40 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, the court in an unpublished opinion denied without prejudice the pharmaceutical giant’s motion to dismiss and/or strike the claims (Smith v Merck & Co, Inc, October 8, 2014, Pisano, J). [read post]