Search for: "MERCK SHARP & DOHME"
Results 61 - 80
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm
The Supreme Court began its 2019 term Monday with oral arguments for two cases: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 11:30 pm
The longstanding dispute over the use of the MERCK trade mark around the world is set to continue for the foreseeable future as the Court of Appeal of England and Wales remitted various issues back to the High Court in Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 1834. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Civil Action No. 16-812-RGA (D.Del. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 3:02 am
Sued if you do, sued if you don’t: drugmaker faces lawsuits over failure to provide Fosamax warning that FDA told it not to provide [Jim Copland, James Beck on Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
One such instance is Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others [2014] EWHC 3867 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Mr Justice Nugee of 21 November.Readers may remember that this trade mark spat has already featured several times on this blog. [read post]
30 May 2016, 6:34 pm
Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:05 am
Margaret Thatcher's birth place in Grantham Source Wikipedia According to Wikiquote, "frit" is an unusual Lincolnshire dialect abbreviation of 'frightened' which Mrs Thatcher evidently recalled from her Grantham childhood. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
The Board’s recent decision in Merck, Sharp, & Dohme Corp., 367 NLRB No. 122 (May 7, 2019) highlights the differences that can arise as a result of the collective bargaining process in the terms and conditions of employment for employers with a divided workforce of non-union and union-represented employees. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 382 (08 April 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2011] EWHC 876 (QB) (08 April 2011) The Legal Services Commission v F & Ors [2011] EWHC 899 (QB) (08 April 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Moria & Anor v Bednash [2011] EWHC 839 (Ch) (08 April 2011) Batt v Royal Mail [2011] EWHC 900 (Ch) (08 April 2011) High Court… [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 7:14 am
Following the first world war the US subsidiary was confiscated and set up as an independent business, eventually coming to operate as Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) outside the US. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:34 am
Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp., C.A. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 9:16 am
In a recent decision, Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp, 367 NLRB No. 122, issued on May 7, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) said No. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:29 am
Subscript Law offers a graphic explainer for Monday’s opinion in Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 8:30 am
Spanish anitrust agency Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Compentencia (CNMC) Tuesday fined US pharmaceutical company Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) 39 million euros for abuse of the market. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:15 am
In In re Rotavirus Vaccines Antitrust Litigation, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. secured a victory in the Third Circuit, which held in a precedential decision that the plaintiffs’ antitrust bundling claims must be arbitrated. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:15 am
In In re Rotavirus Vaccines Antitrust Litigation, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. secured a victory in the Third Circuit, which held in a precedential decision that the plaintiffs’ antitrust bundling claims must be arbitrated. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:15 am
In In re Rotavirus Vaccines Antitrust Litigation, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. secured a victory in the Third Circuit, which held in a precedential decision that the plaintiffs’ antitrust bundling claims must be arbitrated. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:32 am
The Supreme Court opened its January session Monday morning with argument in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 9:59 pm
By Kevin E. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
Last week saw another Michaelmas decision from Mr Justice Arnold in the Patents Court in the form of Merck Sharpe and Dohme Limited v Shionogi & Co Limited [2016] EWHC 2989 (Pat). [read post]
