Search for: "MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2011, 1:21 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Company, upholding the FCC’s interpretation’s of its prior orders as limiting the amount that incumbent Bell carriers can charge for access to facilities used to connect competitors to their network. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:13 am
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) read its regulations and orders in a way that allowed AT&T (now Michigan Bell in Michigan) to charge its competitors only enough to cover its costs, while Michigan Bell wanted to charge market rates (which would allow the company to make a profit). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Company was whether a regulation passed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) required local exchange carriers to make their existing entrance facilities available to competitors at cost-based rates in certain circumstances. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:02 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Co., No. 10-313. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 10:46 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Company (10-313) [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 6:32 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Company. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 11:00 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Company is here. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:38 am
Michigan Bell, No. 10-313. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Company (10-329). [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
In addition to the big decision in Michigan v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
Michigan Bell (10-329) — duty of local telephone company to allow new competitor to link to the existing netork through a connecting wire (consolidiated, one hour of argument) (Justice Kagan is recused) [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Co. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:23 pm
Michigan Bell (10-329). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:26 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Company, 10–329, CA6, presents the questions (1) whether the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the Federal Communications Commission’s Triennial Review Remand Order permit incumbent local telephone companies to charge competing telephone companies rates for entrance facilities used for interconnection; and (2) whether the lower court provided the appropriate level of deference to the… [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Docket: 10-329Issue(s): (1) Whether the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the Federal Communications Commission's Triennial Review Remand Order permit incumbent local telephone companies to charge competing telephone companies competitive rates for entrance facilities used for interconnection; and (2) whether the lower court provided the appropriate level of deference to the FCC's interpretation of… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 1:19 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Docket: 10-329Issue(s): (1) Whether the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the Federal Communications Commission's Triennial Review Remand Order permit incumbent local telephone companies to charge competing telephone companies competitive rates for entrance facilities used for interconnection; and (2) whether the lower court provided the appropriate level of deference to the FCC's interpretation of… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:43 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Company, 267 F.R.D. 213 (E.D.MI.)). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:43 am
Michigan Bell Telephone Company, 267 F.R.D. 213 (E.D.MI.)). [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 1:43 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Company, filed in the Eastern District of Michigan. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340. [read post]
