Search for: "MONTGOMERY v. MAY et al" Results 81 - 98 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2009, 9:20 am by Monica Bay
Shout outs to the folks from Thomson Reuters, Dorsey & Whitney, Merrill, Kroll, Socha/Gelbmann, Jersey Girl, Laverne & Linda, et al! [read post]
Sure, different statutory and nonstatutory considerations may be invoked, but those are malleable. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Henry Morris, et al, Litigation Release No. 21036 (May 12, 2009). [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
"[18] Significantly, anti-trust laws do not necessarily guarantee low prices, only the conditions that lead to them.[19]  This distinction is intentional; the United States Supreme Court has recognized that while it may set the circumstances for achieving a fair price, the workings of a liberal market are better able to determine the fair price itself.[20]  While anti-trust laws prohibit fixing maximum prices, the entire goal of the FPGPA is to accomplish just that. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 10:01 am
"Wersal was a co-plaintiff in Republican Party of Minnesota, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Marion Hotel Partners, LLC, Dimple Patel, et al , a 6-page opinion, Judge Najam writes:Titan Loan Investment Fund, L.P. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
Ohio County, Indiana, et al (NFP) In the Matter of R.W. and M.W. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 2:00 am
Maisel-Hollins Development Co. et al, No. 1:2007cv02351, involves two concurrent lawsuits arising out of the parties’ desire to use their respective service marks in Maryland. [read post]