Search for: "MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC"
Results 21 - 40
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2016, 9:59 pm
After Multiple CBM Petitions, Motorola Invalidates Software Patent By Joseph Herndon -- On March 21, 2016, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a final written decision in the Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review between Motorola Mobility, LLC and Intellectual Ventures I, LLC, in which challenged claims were found to be unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 6:48 am
" Petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review by Motorola Mobility LLC, CBM2015-00004 (PTAB March 21, 2016, Order) (Kauffman, APJ) [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
https://t.co/DqyXd8WZnB -> Apple and Samsung ink deals to enter China's mobile payments by early 2016 https://t.co/TlIE4gLWkB -> What Does BMG v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:01 am
Defendants Motorola Mobility, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., HTC Corp., HTC America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, "Defendants"), filed a Joint Renewed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Declaring All Asserted Patent Claims Invalid Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 7:10 am
" Petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review by Motorola Mobility LLC, CBM2015-00004 (PTAB July 24, 2015, Order) (Kauffman, APJ) [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:10 am
First, the victim, Motorola Mobility, LLC (“Motorola”), asked the Court to review the Seventh Circuit’s ruling that the FTAIA barred claims by Motorola’s foreign subsidiaries for some $3.5 billion in damages they allegedly suffered after purchasing price-fixed LCD panels overseas for inclusion in products to be sold here in the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Motorola Mobility LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:15 pm
The petition of the day is: Motorola Mobility LLC v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 3:26 pm
., Inc. 902619386 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to General Electric Company 902619394 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Exxon Mobil Corp. 902619493 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Texas Instruments Inc 902619519 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Amgen Inc. 902619527 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Goldcorp Inc. 902619535 UBS… [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
Supreme Cour… http://t.co/AvB8ksaQce -> Court says no jurisdiction to transfer domain name Decommodification LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:09 am
Motorola Mobility Llc, No. 11-cv-908, in the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:03 am
Motorola Mobility LLC, 1-11-cv-00908 (DED February 24, 2015, Order) (Robinson, J.) [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:16 pm
For example in the recent Motorola Mobility decision, the PTAB, in denying a post-grant petition, stated it was “not persuaded [p]etitioner ha[d] shown that the claimed subject matter taken as a whole does not recite a technological feature that is novel and unobvious over the prior art. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:41 pm
In Motorola Mobility LLC v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 10:50 am
"U.S. court rejects Motorola Mobility price-fixing appeal": Jonathan Stempel of Reuters has an article that begins, "A federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected Motorola Mobility LLC's attempt to hold several Asian suppliers liable under U.S. antitrust law for fixing prices of mobile phone displays sold to its foreign units. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 11:06 am
Motorola Mobility LLC, Motorola moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 3:12 am
Cascades Computer Innovation, LLC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:51 pm
., Motorola Mobility, LLC, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “defendants”) in the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of various claims of the three patents. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
The district court case is Motorola Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
