Search for: "MacDonald v. Ford Motor Company"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2016, 8:21 pm
In a recent Northern District of California ruling, Judge Tigar found that the plaintiffs, owners and lessees of certain Ford Escape Hybrid and Mercury Mariner Hybrid vehicles, were entitled to attorney’s fees after Ford Motor Company issued a recall for the very component over which the plaintiffs had recently filed suit. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:39 pm
Ford Motor Company, 142 F. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v Vauxhall Motors Ltd, heard 9-10 Jul 2019. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v Vauxhall Motors Ltd, heard 9-10 Jul 2019. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 6:49 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v Vauxhall Motors Ltd, heard 9-10 Jul 2019. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 2:27 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v Vauxhall Motors Ltd, heard 9-10 Jul 2019. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:16 pm
Elezovic v Ford Motor Co, 472 Mich 408 (2005). [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v Vauxhall Motors Ltd, heard 9-10 Jul 2019. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
Ford Motor Company, 435 F.3d 785 (7th Cir. 2006), the 7th Circuit held that the substitution or addition of class representatives in a class action following the enactment of CAFA does not recommence an action for removal purposes so long as the amendment relates back to the original complaint. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
Ford Motor Company, 435 F.3d 785 (7th Cir. 2006), the 7th Circuit held that the substitution or addition of class representatives in a class action following the enactment of CAFA does not recommence an action for removal purposes so long as the amendment relates back to the original complaint. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
As found by the Federal Court in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
