Search for: "Majors v. Sexton"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
” White v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 9:16 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Biden v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:08 am
In Kirk v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Appellate Division, Third Department Improper to discredit Respondent’s denial of paternity on the basis that he never definitively took steps to dissuade the child or anyone else that he was NOT the father In Matter of Montgomery County Dept of Social Services o/b/o Donavin E, v Trini G 195 A.D.3d 1069, 149 N.Y.S.3d 667 (3d Dept.,2021) petitioner commenced a proceeding seeking… [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 1:50 pm
A majority of the Court of Appeals agreed. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 5:40 pm
§ 853issued in Honeycutt v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Political scientists have long debated the degree to which government officials respond to majority preferences. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
In Roach v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
Even when he does not write the majority opinion, he often reveals his thinking in concurrences and dissents. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Stewart, John Edward Sexton Professor of Law and Director, Frank J. [read post]
28 May 2015, 5:09 am
” One of those cases was the 2012 decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:38 am
Judge White filed a separate dissenting opinion (Sexton v Panel Processing, Inc, May 9, 2014, Sutton, J). [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:22 am
On the first threshold, in the BMG case, Justice Sexton of the Federal Court of Appeal said in 2005: [21] Much of the crucial evidence submitted by the plaintiffs was hearsay and no grounds are provided for accepting that hearsay evidence. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:18 pm
By Lee DavisState of Tennessee v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:59 am
Sexton, 2012 U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:34 am
The major issue, of course, is the joinder of the two charges, and the 10th District, in State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 9:52 am
Relying on People v Sexton, 458 Mich 43, 53 (1998) the Court stated that Justice Brickley’s opinion actually expressed the “ultimate holding” of Bender. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:53 am
Rapp was nominated for his excellent work in the mortgage fraud case of the U.S. v Bernadel, et al. [read post]
