Search for: "Marchand v. Marchand" Results 61 - 80 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2022, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
With increased attention to these subjects, two-thirds of the Caremark cases filed after Marchand have been dismissed on motion. [read post]
27 May 2020, 5:19 am
Derivative Litigation, [3] to allow a Caremark claim to proceed beyond the pleadings stage since the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Court of Chancery’s dismissal of a Caremark claim in Marchand v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:47 am
 Clovis is the first decision to allow a Caremark claim to proceed beyond the pleadings since the Delaware Supreme Court’s June 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:02 am
Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, 138 S.Ct. 1061, 200 L.Ed.2d 332, which allowed plaintiffs to bring claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 in state court venues where these claims tend to survive motions to dismiss more often and are otherwise more costly to litigate (and are sometimes concurrently litigated in federal court); An increase in event-driven litigation (including cybersecurity claims, claims premised on calamitous events like the California wildfires, and… [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
For example, in 2020, the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed both prongs of Caremark in the Teamsters v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 11:33 am
The Supreme Court of Canada today issued reasons for its ruling in Canadian Artists’ Representation v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court agrees with great respect to Supreme Court's factual findings and will not disturb the court's custodial determination so long as it is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record as in Matter of Torkildsen v Torkildsen and Matter of Marchand v Nazzaro. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:49 am
This area has been closely watched since the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 2:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Despite this backdrop, in June 2019, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Chancery Court’s dismissal of the Blue Bell case, in Marchand v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Class Actions: JurisdictionLapointe Rosenstein Marchand Melançon LLP v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 11:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The significance of these oversight responsibilities appears even greater in light of the Delaware Chancery Court’s recent decision in Marchand v. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 7:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
To be sure, in a series of cases staring with the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]