Search for: "Mark Battaglia" Results 21 - 33 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2017, 3:44 pm by Jody Simon
10066940 – super hero and a ninja doing battle.I’ve blogged here and here about the pending trademark infringement case brought by SDCC, the registered owners of the San Diego Comic-Con mark, against the producers of Salt Lake Comic Con. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 3:44 pm by Jody Simon
10066940 – super hero and a ninja doing battle.I’ve blogged here and here about the pending trademark infringement case brought by SDCC, the registered owners of the San Diego Comic-Con mark, against the producers of Salt Lake Comic Con. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 4:15 am by Steve Brachmann
However, the defendant’s own pleading in the counterclaim, where it asserted a defense of generic mark, and the court found the evidence to be relevant to the case. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 12:49 pm by CJLF Staff
  Prosecutors argue that Battaglia has sufficient understanding of his crime, while the defense states that he suffers from delusional disorder, marked by a strong belief in untrue things. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 2:46 pm by Daily Record Staff
Term, 2014 (filed Dec. 18, 2014) (Judges Barbera, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, ... [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" (Id. at 154-55 [internal quotation marks, brackets, and citations omitted].) [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm by Danielle Ulman
Lunch was provided by panelist Paul Mark Sandler, name partner of the Baltimore firm Shapiro Sher Guinot & Sandler. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Battaglia, subject to final acceptance of the plea by U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 6:13 am by lawmrh
Battaglia and lawyer Paul Mark Sandler make the opposite argument. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 1:16 pm by Brian Shiffrin
[was] the product of a source independent of the defendant's detention or that the illegal activity was attenuated by a significant intervening event which justified the conclusion that [such] evidence was not the product of the illegal activity" (Battaglia, 82 AD2d at 397 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Srour, 2010 NY Slip Op 213, * 1 [2d Dept Jan 12, 2010] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see also Cherry v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ctr., 63 AD3d 1113, 1116 [2d Dept 2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted].) [read post]