Search for: "Mark A. Favors"
Results 81 - 100
of 12,073
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2018, 3:40 am
CONSOL appealed to the 4th Circuit, which turned down the appeal and upheld the jury award in Butcher’s favor. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:40 am
CONSOL appealed to the 4th Circuit, which turned down the appeal and upheld the jury award in Butcher’s favor. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:40 am
CONSOL appealed to the 4th Circuit, which turned down the appeal and upheld the jury award in Butcher’s favor. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 8:12 pm
"Philadelphia Jury Awards $9.45 Million in Damages Over Prempro Drug; Award marks latest in string of jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs in Philadelphia hormone replacement therapy cases": Amaris Elliott-Engel will have this article in Tuesday's edition of The Legal Intelligencer. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 10:00 am
The Board ruled that the 1982 agreement prohibits use of the subject mark, and it entered judgment summarily in favor of B&L. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:38 pm
This du Pont factor weighs in favor of confusion. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:44 am
Sullivan entered judgment against defendant Asiarim Corporation after a bench trial in favor of plaintiff C=Holdings B.V. on its claim, among others, for trademark infringement of the "Commodore" marks for computers that were popular in the 1980's. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 5:30 pm
Mark J. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:09 pm
In The Fractioning of Patent Law, Professor Mark A. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:09 pm
In The Fractioning of Patent Law, Professor Mark A. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 5:02 pm
“Judge Aileen Cannon’s Reign of Madness Is Over; Here’s why the 11th Circuit, including two Trump judges, ruled in favor of the Department of Justice”: Mark Joseph Stern has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 4:11 am
"Considering all the du Pont factors, and resolving all doubt in favor of the registrant, the Board found confusion likely.TTABlog comment: Not a very convincing decision. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 10:05 pm
Sand Hill Advisors, LLC in January, after the Northern District of California granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant on plaintiff’s trademark infringement claims. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:43 pm
MARK A. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 10:09 am
In August 2007, the district court granted summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of defendants. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 9:43 am
Relevant factors: the MOAB mark was “relatively weak,” somewhere between suggestive and arbitrary; for these purposes, suggestive marks are conceptually weak, and Moab produced no evidence of commercial strength of either mark. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 4:59 am
In a battle over the marks NITRO and NITRO RACING for motorcycle helmets and protective clothing, the Board ruled in favor of Opposer/Petitioner Lloyd Lifestyle in finding that Applicant/Registrant Soaring Helmet was not the owner of the marks at the time it applied for registration. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:37 pm
It looks like my prediction was pretty much on the mark. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:52 am
The court identified this potential problem, however dismissed this argument in favor of the policy of allowing the public to assist in controlling false marking. [read post]
5 May 2015, 10:39 am
Related Posts: Tito Responds (16) Tito Case Moves Forward, Not in Tito’s Favor (0) The Tito’s Lawsuit: When Approval is Not Approval (18) [read post]
