Search for: "Mark Abe" Results 141 - 160 of 1,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2022, 3:21 am
And so, the Board found that Respondent TMRR was not the owner of the mark when the underlying application was filed, and the subject registration was therefore void ab initio. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:51 am by David Leffler
In the present case (PMÄ 10269-19), the company GDL Transport AB (where AB stands for Aktiebolag = limited liability company) applied to change its name to GDL AB. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:45 pm by Simon Lester
With two Appellate Body appointments coming soon, this paper -- entitled "Agents, Trustees, and International Courts: The Politics of Judicial Appointment at the World Trade Organization" -- by Manfred Elsig and Mark Pollack is very well-timed. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:06 am
The Board observed that a Section 1(a) application is void ab initio if the mark was not in use in commerce at the time of filing. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
 Having said so, it is possible that distinctive character is acquired through use, thus paving the way to registration of a sign that ab initio would have not been otherwise eligible for protection as a trade mark. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm by Alan L. Friel and Niloufar Massachi
This marks the advent of a new era of consumer privacy protection that will have the force of law in the U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:20 am by Dennis Crouch
Conolty O’Connor NYC LLC, 111 USPQ2d 1302, 1310 (TTAB 2014) (“the involved application is void ab initio because applicant is not the sole owner of the mark”). [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
This one concerns a type of mark that I daresay most trade mark lawyers will never have the pleasure of applying for – a sound mark.I understand this was the first judgment at the General Court level or above dealing with sound marks. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 5:17 pm by John L. Welch
DIDDY mark, false suggestion of a connection under Section 2(a), and mere descriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:00 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP.
Partially allowing the appeal, a Court of Appeal panel of Smith LJ, Leveson LJ and Sir Mark Waller once again dismissed the application for summary judgment on procedural grounds but found against the claimants on the points on limitation. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 7:18 am by Julius Stobbs
Julius Stobbs and Cameron Malone-BrownAs discussed in our recent post here, the draft withdrawal agreement published by the EU Commission sets out a potential framework for trade mark and design rights AB (Anno Brexit). [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 2:58 am
[Answers in first comment].In re Maryhill AB, Serial No. 88102714 (May 28, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 2:40 am
If the applicant has not used the mark on any of the goods or services, then the application is void ab initio. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 6:07 am
Aus der Medienmitteilung:"Wer den Schutz seiner Marke in der Schweiz um weitere zehn Jahre verlängern will, zahlt ab dem 1. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:05 am by John L. Welch
In light of Bumb's lack of documentation and his own testimony, the Board found the applications to be void ab initio due to Bumb's lack of bona fide intent to use the marks. [read post]