Search for: "Mark Abe"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
Counsel must understand how the TTAB and the district courts are now addressing fraud to be able to meet the increased challenges of pleading and proving fraud and the related claims of void ab initio and no bona fide intent. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
Playdom then filed a petition to cancel Couture’s mark, claiming that his application was void ab initio because he had not rendered any services on or before the filing date of the application and that, therefore, his PLAYDOM mark was not in commerce. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 6:17 am
Posted by Mark Mendelsohn and Alex Oh, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, on Wednesday, October 11, 2017 Editor's Note: Mark Mendelsohn and Alex Oh are partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 2:09 pm
These products bear establishment number “EST. 18747” inside the USDA mark of inspection. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Modhej & Anor, R (On the Applications) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 957 (17 July 2012) Khaira & Ors v Shergill & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 983 (17 July 2012) AB, (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 978 (17 July 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Red Bull GmbH v Sun Mark Ltd & Anor [2012] EWHC 1929 (Ch) (17 July 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Roberts, R (on the application of) v The Commissioner of the… [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:48 am
One bill that does not cover all employers, but will be of keen interest to some, is AB 569. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:27 am
Case T‑394/10, Elena Grebenshikova v OHIM, Volvo Trademark Holding AB intervening, is a fascinating decision of the General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) on 5 December. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 2:04 pm
Consultants Mark Momerak of NISC Coop and Steve Senne of Finley Engineering Company provided their perspectives. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:10 pm
The free webinar on December 10, 2020 ;is titled, "A new year, a new [ab]normal: Adapting to Covid in the new academic year, and to look at how our institutions are adapting to ‘the new [ab]normal’. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:47 pm
AB 140 actually changes the definition of California's undue influence statute. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 9:13 am
California Governor Newsom signed AB 587 into law in September 2022. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:45 am
It ruled that his application was void ab initio. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:46 pm
Goldsmith, nor the lead attorneys for CARB, Mark Poole and Gavin McAbe of the California Attorney General’s Office, knew about the Court of Appeals order as of yesterday. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 6:06 am
The Board thus came to the conclusion on the basis of that evidence that it, individually and as a whole, had not shown the necessary acquired distinctive character.Recalling the CJEU decision in Nestlé (C-84/17 P, C-85/17 P and C-95/17 P, see IPKat here), the GC restated that it would be necessary (in the context of this particular mark) for the evidence submitted to establish acquisition of distinctive character in all of the Member States of the EU where the mark was… [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 2:32 pm
These licenses will be marked with the term “federal limits apply” on the front of the license. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 1:17 am
In the case of August Storck KG v OHIM, the CJEU saw that a mark can be registered under Article 7(3) (which has to be read in conjunction with Article 52 above) "…only if evidence is provided that it has acquired, in consequence of the use which has been made of it, distinctive character in the part of the [EU] in which it did not, ab initio, have such character". [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:07 am
[In this complicated case concerning ownership of the two marks shown immediately below, for restaurant services, the Board sustained Opposer Constantine's oppositions, ruling that applicant was not the owner of the marks at the time the applications were filed, and consequently, both of the opposed applications were void ab initio]. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 1:17 am
In the case of August Storck KG v OHIM, the CJEU saw that a mark can be registered under Article 7(3) (which has to be read in conjunction with Article 52 above) "…only if evidence is provided that it has acquired, in consequence of the use which has been made of it, distinctive character in the part of the [EU] in which it did not, ab initio, have such character". [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 4:08 am
" When a mark has not been used in commerce by the day the use-based application is filed, the application is void ab initio. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 10:30 pm
Die Frist beträgt drei Monate und läuft seit Veröffentlichung der Eintragung im Markenregister (Art. 31 Abs. 2 MSchG). [read post]
