Search for: "Mark D Ware" Results 41 - 60 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2019, 12:16 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A registration bar wouldn’t harm First Amendment interests much, because businesses would remain free to use the terms, even as marks, and could still register other marks. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:37 am by Camilla Hrdy
" Whether a mark is in a trademark space can obviously help illuminate whether a mark fails to function, in the way Roberts described. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:41 pm by Vincent LoTempio
A US trade-mark registration grants exclusivity throughout the US for the trade-mark in relation to those wares/services. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
TTAB finds DIRT DRIFTERS merely descriptive: In re Esposito (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB: Registration denied for GITZIT mark based on earlier identical mark for identical goods: J L Pennington v GITZIT, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Dana-Farber Cancer Institute – DFCI protests Dr Farber’s The Farber Center for Radiation Oncology (The Trademark Blog) Gosling –… [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Angel Martinez, Decker's chairman and CEO stated that:“The success of Ugg Australia has created an entire industry of companies that market their wares by deliberately confusing consumers. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:42 am by David Vasella
Sie beschränkte sich auf Hinweise auf die Ware und ästhetische Stilelemente; als Hinweis auf ein bestimmtes Unternehmen werde sie nicht wahrgenommen. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 7:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Though this was a circumvention of the first sale doctrine, that’s ok: “[d]istribution of a product that does not meet the trademark holder’s quality control standards may result in the devaluation of the mark by tarnishing its image. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
Cochlear Corp (Property, intangible) District Court N D Illinois: Patentee’s ‘policy and practice’ of marking was insufficient to establish compliance with marking requirement: von Holdt v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:49 am by Lorraine Fleck
http://ow.ly/eoqro  In Cyberattacks on Banks, Evidence of a New Weapon http://ow.ly/eiKid  Privacy Advocates and Advertisers at Odds Over Web Tracking http://ow.ly/eiK66  Most Americans Are Wary of Being Tracked Online, Study Says http://ow.ly/ejxlB  In Technology Wars, Using the Patent as a Sword http://ow.ly/ei4dh  Privacy concerns | In Texas, Schools Use IDs to Track Students http://ow.ly/ehYcY  What You Must Know About Mobile Malware http://ow.ly/elRbW  The… [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am by Marie Louise
Access Copyright (IP Osgoode) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) CIPO Wares and Services Manual contracts again (Trade Mark Blog) Robertson class action settlement #2 decision released: Heather Robertson v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am by Marie Louise
Wares and Services Manual expands (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trade-marks: Use it as registered: Bigras v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog)   Global Global – General Why no one is reading this post (IP Think Tank) It’s the silly season but this is ridiculous (IP Think Tank) Year end wishes for… [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 5:58 am by David Vasella
Es war vielmehr davon ausgegangen, dass die Marke ja eingetragen sei, und ausserdem habe sie sich im Verkehr durchgesetzt. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 2:43 pm by Cathy
She’d met some of the American part of the family when they’d been to Israel but she’d never been to the US and met the others. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 10:09 am by Josh Sturtevant
Should consumers be banned from placing their wares from Big Lots or JCPenney inside the Coach bag, thus trading (deceptively) on Coach’s social value? [read post]
24 May 2011, 4:58 am by Josh Sturtevant
As a preliminary matter, I’d like to dispense with two basic points: first, the bags in question are protected by trademark, not copyright. [read post]