Search for: "Mark Doe" Results 81 - 100 of 42,355
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2008, 5:55 am
Is Mark Steyn truly an advocate of unfettered free speech? [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 3:23 am
Crane argued that it is still entitled to register a two-dimensional designeven if it sells a three-dimensional product, but the Board was unmoved:Applicant’s attempt to register the mark with a description of it as "a two-dimensional depiction of a three-dimensional housing" does not alter the likely consumer perceptions, or for that matter perceptions of competitors, that what is claimed is the trade dress as otherwise depicted in the drawing and the description. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:13 am
We talk about how he set up of the company, how it does its business and the future of provision of family law services, amongst other things. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:12 am by Peter Groves
Or does the law go as far as one might reasonably expect? [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
Three questions suggest themselves: (i) under what circumstances can a hashtag slogan be inherently distinctive, especially if the mark does not contain a previously registered mark as a component; (ii) if a hashtag slogan is found descriptive, is it still registrable upon proof of secondary meaning; and (iii) is it more appropriate to view such a mark as being simultaneously distinctive and functional? [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 6:45 am by Gene Quinn
A dim view of software patents does not make Mark Cuban unique, but his latest foray into the patent debate does provide interesting insights into his arbitrary views on innovation. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 9:00 pm
" [TTABlog question: Why does the registered mark look to me like three words compounded?] [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 12:34 am
If a third party attempts to register your verified trade mark in any of the new gTLDs, he gets a notification that he is trying to register a trade mark that does not belong to him. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
However, the Directive does impose stringent requirements as to the nature of the sign of which a mark must consist and these are addressed under Articles 2 and 3 of the Directive. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:55 am
"This judgment does not close the door on Gleissner-controlled entities being involved in UK IPO proceedings in future, but it is likely to present an obstacle. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:40 am
" So begins, Carr J's latest trade mark judgment in the English High Court - Pathway IP SARL v Easygroup Ltd [2018] EWHC 3608.This case was a High Court appeal from a successful application by EasyGroup to revoke two trade marks for non-use. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:58 am
Popular discourse about trade marks does not seem to have the same political and ethical engagement as do patents and copyright (when is the last time that any Kat reader said to himself—“trade marks are a geopolitical matter”). [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 5:02 am
Does bad faith within the meaning of Article 21(1)(b) of Regulation ... 874/2004 exist if a domain was registered in the first phase of phased registration on the basis of a trade mark, coinciding with a German-language generic term, which the domain holder acquired only for the purpose of being able to register the domain in the first phase of phased registration and thereby to pre-empt other interested parties, including the holders of rights to the mark? [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm by Paul Caron
David Gamage (Indiana) presents The Political-Instability Benefits of Deferral and the Case for Wealth Tax or Mark-to-Market Style Tax Reform (with John Brooks (Georgetown)) at BYU today as part of its Tax Policy Colloquium Series hosted by Cliff Fleming and Gladriel Shobe: The U.S. tax system does a very poor... [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:31 pm
Although Ranbaxy argues that the False Marking Statute is criminal in nature, Section 292(b) does not permit prosecution of criminal actions, but instead creates a stand-alone civil action with a separate criminal companion. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:55 pm by war
Accordingly, her Honour considered: Bad faith, in the context of s 62A, does not, in my opinion, require, although it includes, dishonesty or fraud. [read post]