Search for: "Mark E. Ting"
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2016, 8:31 pm
There, they explained that the rules “are not subject to scrutiny under the First Amendment because they do not regulate any person’s speech” but rather regulate ISPs’ “conduct” – the act of “transmit[ting] others’ speech through [a] conduit. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Julia Canzoneri and Angela Shin Wei Ting preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
Wilson-Coker, 311 F.3d 132, 138 (2d Cir. 2002) (“[E]ven relatively informal [agency] interpretations, such as letters from regional administrators, warrant respectful consideration” where the statute at issue is complex and the regulatory agency possesses “considerable expertise”) (citations and quotations omitted). [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
As reported by CNN: Five speech therapists in Hong Kong were found guilty of a conspiracy to publish seditious children's books on Wednesday, in a case that rights defenders say marks a major blow to free speech amid a tightening of civil liberties in the Chinese territory. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:15 pm
Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks omitted) (alterations added [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 12:00 pm
That’s no easy move to make, considering K&E had 2009 PPP of just under $2.5 million. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:06 am
For example, in Ting v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 5:43 am
Defendants argued that “General Steel” wasn’t a valid mark. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:45 am
See Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights, 547 U.S. at 59 (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 11:16 am
Over the weekend some conservative commentators pushed back on my tweet-claim that President Trump has “threaten[ed] DOJ/FBI over and over in gross violation of independence norms. [read post]
21 May 2009, 9:34 am
Remember when I marked that document "privileged," and then someone else marked it "non-responsive"? [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
Despite his knowledge, Piatetsky eschewed personal protective equipment even when working at dusty work sites well marked with warnings. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
The statements, widely quoted, were also tinged with irony, a large dollop of poking fun, and a bit of reaction:When asked if he thought China’s relationship with the US should be adjusted as globalisation has come under pressure, Xi said: “More than 10,000 people fly between China and the US on a daily basis, which is about 4 million [people] a year. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm
High Court Rules Challenge to Trump Census Plan Is Premature Associated Press News – Mark Sherman | Published: 12/18/2020 The U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:13 pm
Opinion in CBD v. [read post]
