Search for: "Mark J Powell" Results 1 - 20 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2007, 1:44 pm
September 19, 2007 marks the 100th anniversary of the birth of Supreme Court Justice Lewis F. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:54 pm by John Marshall
Cranford Municipal Court, 8 Springfield Avenue, Cranford, NJ 07016 Telephone Number: 908-709-7200 Website: http://www.cranford.com/township/display.asp Court Representatives: The Judge is the Honorable Mark J. [read post]
1 May 2017, 1:10 pm
Kertzer, & Mark Paradis, Homo Diplomaticus: Mixed-Method Evidence of Variation in Strategic Rationality Richard K. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Magliocca, Ajay Mehrotra, William J. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 6:04 am
Kessler, who is representing the younger Erving along with Mark J. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Ramirez, Nicholas Capaldi, Gilbert Paul Carrasco, Iryna Zaverukha, Russell Powell, Dean Vincent Rougeau, Amelia J. [read post]
28 May 2019, 12:37 am by Dave
London and Quadrant HR v Patrick [2019] EWHC 1263 (QB) follows hard on the footsteps of Powell v Dacorum BC [2019] EWCA Civ 29 and Forward v Aldwyck Housing Group Ltd [2019] EWHC 24 (QB) (our note here), with Turner J making some fairly caustic observations about the use of the public sector equality duty in possession cases. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:38 pm by Barry Eagar
This court made three points about the Powell case:1. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 12:48 am
 Details of the event can be found here and to register please click here.Big brains to meet in Brussels at EPLAW congress:  This year's EPLAW congress is being held this Friday in Brussels where the likes of Kevin Mooney (Simmons & Simmons), Pierre Véron (Véron & Associes) , Edward Nodder (Bristows), Klaus Haft (Hoyng Rokh Monegier), Benjamin Ostapuk (Intel), Penny Gilbert (Powell Gilbert) and József Tálas (Sar… [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 11:29 am
"A $3.4 million legal malpractice verdict in Luzerne County President Judge Mark A. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 3:37 am
But this is a narrow exception to the general rule that a person will not be bound by the outcome of proceedings to which he is not a party: Skyparks v Marks, Powell v Wiltshire, Seven Arts v Content. iii) A direct commercial interest in the outcome of the litigation is insufficient to make someone a privy: Kirin-Amgen v Boehringer Mannheim. iv) Whether members of the same group of companies are privies or not depends on the facts: Special Effects. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Levy Center for Constitutional Studies; Stephanie Barclay, Assistant Professor, J. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:38 am by CMS
Fancourt J, as trial judge, had heard extensive expert evidence to determine these foreign law issues. [read post]