Search for: "Mark J. Ginsburg" Results 81 - 100 of 179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2015, 7:09 am by Ilya Shapiro
Roemer, . . . (1991) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh reports for Education Week that “[j]udging by the tone of a joint press conference the four largest public-employee unions held last week [about the case], the labor movement is girding for an era in which they will no longer be able to charge ‘agency fees’ to employees in a bargaining unit who refuse to join the union to cover those workers’ share of collective bargaining costs. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FOR LAKE COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT Mark S. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 9:01 pm
That is no sanction at all”); Herring, supra, at 152 (GINSBURG, J., dissenting) (the exclusionary rule is “an essential auxiliary” to the Fourth Amendment). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
ALITO, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which GINSBURG, BREYER, and KAGAN, JJ., joined. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
At the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 10:24 am by admin
Justice Ginsburg’s public pronouncement was, of course, inappropriate, but accurate nonetheless. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 10:24 am by Schachtman
Justice Ginsburg’s public pronouncement was, of course, inappropriate, but accurate nonetheless. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 8:24 am by Josh Blackman
S. 618, 661 (2007) (Ginsburg, J., dissenting). [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:16 am by Ronald Collins
But is this not yet another mark of a great jurist, the ability to provoke this hardy to-and-fro in American legal thinking? [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:10 am by Lyle Denniston
”  She was reacting to the broad argument made by a government lawyer, Benjamin J. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am by Douglas E. Abrams
[xxix] “Being a lawyer can be pleasant or unpleasant,” explains Judge William J. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
President Donald J. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
” Mark Sherman reports at AP that “[j]ustices decide for themselves when to step aside from cases the court is considering, and it is highly unlikely either justice would sit out cases involving Trump, including two cases the court will hear on March 31 over subpoenas for Trump’s tax, bank and financial records. [read post]